AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Databricks Lakehouse · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Databricks Lakehouse

36Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in DMP for mid-market buyers
Rank 21 of 159 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Databricks Lakehouse →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dmp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Databricks Lakehouse for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Data management platformsGTM data and infrastructure0%21 of 1590%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Data clean roomsGTM data and infrastructure0%34 of 1000%1under 10 labels · led by Snowflake Data Clean Rooms at 19%

Movement

Since September 2026, Databricks Lakehouse held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · DMP · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 152 → 128 of 161
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 29 → 18 of 150
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 25 → 20 of 137

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
DMP0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 29 → 21 of 159
Data clean rooms0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 34 of 100, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Databricks Lakehouse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10102
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2001102
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative25 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative7 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Snowflake, Microsoft Fabric, and Databricks are the leading "modern" warehouses/lakehouses” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DMP · comparative prompt · first choice
“Pick Databricks if ML/AI, data engineering, and flexibility are your top priorities” Kimi K2 · DMP · comparative prompt · first choice
“Native Spark environment optimized for Python/R and machine learning workloads.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DMP · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Databricks if your organization relies heavily on Machine Learning, AI, and massive unstructured datasets” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DMP · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Databricks Lakehouse, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Databricks Lakehouse was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Snowflake31 of 365Not among the top eight
BigQuery21 of 362Not among the top eight
Collibra20 of 360Not among the top eight
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud16 of 364Not among the top eight
Alation12 of 360Not among the top eight
Fivetran12 of 360Not among the top eight
Microsoft Fabric12 of 360Not among the top eight
Amazon Redshift11 of 360Not among the top eight
IBM InfoSphere10 of 360Not among the top eight
Oracle BlueKai8 of 360Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Databricks Lakehouse. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 36 answers that named Databricks Lakehouse and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fortegrp.com14
improvado.io14
g2.com10
blog.hubspot.com9
databricks.comYour site9
fivetran.com9
blog.panoply.io8
doit.software8
domo.com8
estuary.dev8

Eighty-eight of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming Databricks Lakehouse came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

databricks.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Databricks Lakehouse takes 0% of first choices and Segment takes 37%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “data management platform for audiences”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best data management platform for audiences”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,000 a month (“databricks lakehouse”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
225 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 689,756 a month
Searches its site ranks for
43,327 · 6,682 in the top three
Sites linking to it
33,328
Paid Google search
33 searches its ads show for, about 570 clicks and $34,664 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 88 text, 27 image, 5 video · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2024, as Databricks, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 110 in the year, 10 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 21 of 159 in DMP
Segment leader
37%
Segment
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
36 answers
Its own site cited
in 33 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on databricks.com
24,115
subdomains included
Content
6,867
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,978
Product · Integration
243 · 13
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog3,030102026-09-28CDP
Conference or event2,76602026-06-15CDP
Report or ebook47302023-06-01CDP
Webinar or virtual event27702020-08-01
Glossary or explainer23202020-01-01CDP
Comparison4102022-03-01
Case study3902019-02-01
News or press602021-07-01
Podcast or video202021-04-01
Template or tool1undated

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on databricks.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page databricks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CDP (17); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Databricks Lakehouse

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Databricks Lakehouse; a claim can dispute any of them.
Databricks 12Databricks (Lakehouse) 1Databricks Lakehouse (Clean Room Features) 1Databricks Lakehouse Platform 1

Follow Databricks Lakehouse

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Databricks is the company behind Databricks Lakehouse.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
San Francisco, United States
Founded
2013
Employees
about 4,000 (2022)

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Unify your data, analytics and AI
For
Whether you’re a startup or global enterprise, Databricks is built to meet the demands of your business at any scale.
Price stated
Usage-based pricing keeps spending in check databricks.com/product/databricks-lakehouse
Free plan or trial
Try for free databricks.com/product/data-lakehouse
Hosting
AWSAzureGCPSAP
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, customers

What Databricks Lakehouse's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: usergroups.databricks.com/open-lakehouse-ai, databricks.com/product/data-lakehouse, databricks.com/glossary/data-lakehouse, databricks.com/product/databricks-lakehouse, databricks.com/product/pricing/databricks-lakehouse. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Databricks Lakehouse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Databricks Lakehouse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Databricks Lakehouse by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Databricks Lakehouse is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Databricks Lakehouse, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at databricks.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.