GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Brault · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Brault

5Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Brault was named 3 times in DAM, where Canto led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business24 of 72

under the label threshold

Mid-market6 of 68

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In dam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Brault for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital asset management	Marketing	4%	6 of 68	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Canto at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Brault yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Brault across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained4 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“starting with a modern, affordable platform like Filecamp or Brault would provide better ease of use” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAM · budget prompt · first choice

“Best Overall Value & Features: Brault ... Brault is currently the standout leader.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DAM · budget prompt · first choice

“Other options to consider are Brault Lite/Pro/Growth, Filecamp, and Daminion” Llama 4 Maverick · DAM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Brault, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Brault was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ResourceSpace5 of 51Not in the top three

Filecamp4 of 51Not in the top three

Air3 of 50Not in the top three

Pics.io3 of 50Not in the top three

Daminion2 of 50Not in the top three

Canto1 of 51Not in the top three

Air.inc1 of 50Not in the top three

Brandfolder1 of 50Not in the top three

Bynder1 of 50Not in the top three

Stockpress1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Brault. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 5 answers that named Brault and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

brault.appYour site2

celum.com2

mediavalet.com2

stockpress.co2

vntana.com2

alternativeto.net1

blog.hubspot.com1

daminion.net1

github.com1

imagekit.io1

Thirteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Brault came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

brault.app/blog/digital-asset-management/best-digital-asset-management-software2

celum.com/en/blog/digital-asset-management-systems2

mediavalet.com/blog/best-digital-asset-management-platform2

vntana.com/roundup/best-digital-asset-management-software2

alternativeto.net/software/open-source-alternatives/about1

blog.hubspot.com/website/digital-asset-management1

daminion.net/articles/tools/self-hosted-dam1

github.com/limiw/open-source-discussions/blob/master/5-open-source-digital-asset-managemen1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Brault

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Brault; a claim can dispute any of them.

Brault Lite/Pro/Growth 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Brault's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Brault, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at brault.app is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.