GTM AI Index
Index Sales Sales engagement › HubSpot Sales Hub vs Klenty
Sales engagement platforms · September 2026 Edition

HubSpot Sales Hub vs Klenty

Zero of twelve models named HubSpot Sales Hub first on the direct prompt; zero named Klenty. HubSpot Sales Hub was named by twelve of the twelve models and Klenty by nine and HubSpot Sales Hub carries 48 labels and Klenty 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.

HubSpot Sales Hub

accepted challenger

By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in sixteen categories this edition.

Klenty

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share8%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels4817A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, HubSpot Sales Hub reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Salesloft was named alongside these two in twelve of the twelve direct answers. Salesloft vs HubSpot Sales Hub · Salesloft vs Klenty · Apollo.io vs HubSpot Sales Hub

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales engagement platforms page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HubSpot Sales HubFirst choices, of twelve modelsKlenty
Direct00
Paraphrase30
Comparative01
Budget-constrained12
Scale-constrained001 against Klenty
Negative112 against HubSpot Sales Hub
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where HubSpot Sales Hub and Klenty stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
HubSpot Sales Hub Klenty first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, HubSpot Sales Hub on the left and Klenty on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where HubSpot Sales Hub and Klenty stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice alternatives: Apollo.io, HubSpot Sales Hub, Outreach, Salesloft
GPT-5.4 miniSalesloft alternatives: HubSpot Sales Hub, Outreach
Gemini 3.5 FlashSalesloft alternatives: Apollo.io, HubSpot Sales Hub
Perplexity SonarSalesloft alternatives: Apollo.io, HubSpot Sales Hub, Outreach
Grok 4.1 FastSalesloft alternatives: Apollo.io, HubSpot Sales Hub
DeepSeek V4 FlashApollo.io alternatives: Groove, HubSpot Sales Hub, Salesloft
Qwen 3.7 FlashSalesloft alternatives: HubSpot Sales Hub, Klenty, Outreach

Neither was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Mistral SmallApollo.io alternatives: Outreach, Salesloft
Llama 4 MaverickApollo.io, Outreach, Salesloft
Kimi K2Apollo.io alternatives: Outreach, Salesloft
GLM 4.7 FlashXApollo.io alternatives: Salesloft
MiniMax M2.5Outreach alternatives: Apollo.io, Salesloft

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Klenty leads by four points.
Klenty13%#2 of 13
HubSpot Sales Hub10%#3 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: HubSpot Sales Hub leads at mid-market.
HubSpot Sales Hub8%#4 of 10
Klenty4%#5 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
HubSpot Sales Hub leads by ten points.
HubSpot Sales Hub10%#4 of 7
Klenty0%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about HubSpot Sales Hub

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Never use for cold email: HubSpot Sales Hub” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“some features are only accessible in high-tier plans, which can be costly, and the platform can sometimes be slow” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative

What the models said about Klenty

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“lightweight SMB tools (Mixmax, Apollo, Klenty) may strain your governance needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Klenty and Apollo suit SMB and mid-market outbound teams; ... Klenty, Reply, and Mailshake are the strongest picks” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“1. Klenty ... Offers multi-channel cadences, native CRM integrations ... at a fraction of enterprise costs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Safer bets for most (higher consensus positives): Klenty/Reply.io/Lemlist/Instantly for SMB/mid-market” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.