LinkSquares vs GetAccept
Two of twelve models named LinkSquares first on the direct prompt; zero named GetAccept. LinkSquares was named by eleven of the twelve models and GetAccept by seven and LinkSquares carries 30 labels and GetAccept 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
founded 2015. Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the contract lifecycle management and e-signature page.
By framing
LinkSquaresFirst choices, of twelve modelsGetAccept
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
LinkSquares GetAccept first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, LinkSquares on the left and GetAccept on the right.The direct prompt
LinkSquares first, GetAccept not the choice
2 of 12 modelsGetAccept was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
GetAccept4%#5 of 15LinkSquares0%#– of 15LinkSquares4%#6 of 16GetAccept4%#7 of 16LinkSquares0%#8 of 8GetAccept0%#– of 8What the models said about LinkSquares
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Users reported issues with self-service flexibility for sales... lack of natural language search, and occasional glitches in the platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“positioned more strongly for post-signature analytics than front-end negotiation” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Top-rated alternatives with fewer complaints: LinkSquares, Malbek, Juro (4.6-4.7/5, praised for ease/AI).” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“LinkSquares is frequently cited as an excellent choice for mid-market companies.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B: LinkSquares” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about GetAccept
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“The best e-signature and contract management tools for mid-sized B2B companies are: 1. GetAccept” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.