Concord vs LinkSquares
One of twelve models named Concord first on the direct prompt; two named LinkSquares. Concord was named by ten of the twelve models and LinkSquares by eleven and Concord carries 19 labels and LinkSquares 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Austin, founded 2014. Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the contract lifecycle management and e-signature page.
By framing
ConcordFirst choices, of twelve modelsLinkSquares
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
Concord LinkSquares first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Concord on the left and LinkSquares on the right.The direct prompt
Concord first, LinkSquares not the choice
1 of 12 modelsLinkSquares was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.LinkSquares first, Concord not the choice
2 of 12 modelsConcord was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Concord8%#4 of 15LinkSquares0%#– of 15Concord0%#– of 8LinkSquares0%#8 of 8What the models said about Concord
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“My top recommendation: Concord for its flat pricing and comprehensive features” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Juro or Concord would be the best starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd usually start with Concord” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about LinkSquares
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Users reported issues with self-service flexibility for sales... lack of natural language search, and occasional glitches in the platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“positioned more strongly for post-signature analytics than front-end negotiation” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Top-rated alternatives with fewer complaints: LinkSquares, Malbek, Juro (4.6-4.7/5, praised for ease/AI).” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“LinkSquares is frequently cited as an excellent choice for mid-market companies.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B: LinkSquares” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.