Juro vs LinkSquares
Six of twelve models named Juro first on the direct prompt; two named LinkSquares. Juro was named by eleven of the twelve models and LinkSquares by eleven and Juro carries 31 labels and LinkSquares 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the contract lifecycle management and e-signature page.
By framing
JuroFirst choices, of twelve modelsLinkSquares
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Juro and LinkSquares were named in the same answer twenty-nine times, of the 65 answers naming Juro and the 53 naming LinkSquares. In those answers LinkSquares took the first choice one time and Juro four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
Juro LinkSquares first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Juro on the left and LinkSquares on the right.The direct prompt
Juro first, LinkSquares an alternative
6 of 12 modelsLinkSquares was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.LinkSquares first, Juro an alternative
2 of 12 modelsJuro was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
What the models said about Juro
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Verdict: Approach with caution if you require strong reporting, flexibility, and advanced collaboration features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“typically starts around $15,000–$30,000/year (Juro, SpotDraft, Ironclad)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Juro is the strongest overall pick—best user experience, fast deployment, and pricing that scales with contract volume” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Juro is a browser-native contract automation platform built specifically for fast-growing mid-market companies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you want one practical default recommendation, I'd pick Juro for a typical mid-market B2B company” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about LinkSquares
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Users reported issues with self-service flexibility for sales... lack of natural language search, and occasional glitches in the platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“positioned more strongly for post-signature analytics than front-end negotiation” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Top-rated alternatives with fewer complaints: LinkSquares, Malbek, Juro (4.6-4.7/5, praised for ease/AI).” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“LinkSquares is frequently cited as an excellent choice for mid-market companies.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B: LinkSquares” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.