Marketing resource management · October 2026 Edition
monday.com Work Management vs Smartsheet
One of fourteen models named monday.com Work Management first on the direct prompt; one named Smartsheet. monday.com Work Management was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Smartsheet by eight and monday.com Work Management carries 44 labels and Smartsheet 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By monday.com, Tel Aviv, founded 2012. Named in one category this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
First-choice share9%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate18%20%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels4410A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, monday.com Work Management reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Wrike for Marketing was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Wrike for Marketing vs monday.com Work Management · Wrike for Marketing vs Smartsheet · ClickUp vs monday.com Work Management
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the marketing resource management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
monday.com Work ManagementFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSmartsheet
Direct11
Paraphrase101 against Smartsheet
Comparative002 against monday.com Work Management
Budget-constrained20
Scale-constrained11
Negative006 against monday.com Work Management · 1 against Smartsheet
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where monday.com Work Management and Smartsheet stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
monday.com Work Management Smartsheet first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, monday.com Work Management on the left and Smartsheet on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where monday.com Work Management and Smartsheet stood in it.
monday.com Work Management first, Smartsheet not the choice
1 of 14 modelsSmartsheet was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GLM 4.7 FlashXWrike for Marketing, monday.com Work Management alternatives: Asana, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Screendragon
Smartsheet first, monday.com Work Management not the choice
1 of 14 modelsmonday.com Work Management was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashSmartsheet, Teamwork.com alternatives: Uptempo
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Wrike for Marketing alternatives: Asana, HubSpot Marketing Hub, monday.com Work Management
Gemini 3.5 FlashWrike for Marketing alternatives: Optimizely Content Marketing Platform, Screendragon, Uptempo, monday.com Work Management
Grok 4.1 FastWrike for Marketing alternatives: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Teamwork.com, monday.com Work Management
Mistral SmallScreendragon alternatives: Teamwork.com, monday.com Work Management
DeepSeek V4 FlashWrike for Marketing alternatives: Asana, ClickUp, Screendragon, monday.com Work Management
Kimi K2Wrike for Marketing alternatives: Bynder, monday.com Work Management
MiniMax M2.5Wrike for Marketing alternatives: Lytho, Teamwork.com, monday.com Work Management
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniLytho alternatives: monday Work Management
Perplexity SonarUptempo alternatives: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Lytho, Teamwork.com, Wrike for Marketing, monday Work Management
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
GPT-6 LunaWrike for Marketing alternatives: Adobe Workfront, Marmind
Muse Glimmer 30BFrontify alternatives: Bynder, Uptempo
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
monday.com Work Management leads by twenty-five points.
monday.com Work Management27%#1 of 13Smartsheet2%#10 of 13Mid-marketThe figures above
monday.com Work Management leads by five points.
monday.com Work Management9%#3 of 11Smartsheet4%#7 of 11Enterprise
monday.com Work Management leads by two points.
monday.com Work Management2%#7 of 10Smartsheet0%#8 of 10What the models said about monday.com Work Management
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Missing features - Users report limitations like messaging contacts and seat requirements” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“trying to force Asana or Monday.com to act as your MRM will result in "tool sprawl."” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Compare it against requirements for formal resource planning, financial controls and governance before treating it as a full MRM replacement.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Some of the top-rated MRM software include monday.com, which has an overall rating of 4.7 out of 5 and is recognized as a Leader in the Marketing Resource Management Category.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Highly visual, exceptionally easy to adopt, great for automation... Excellent for mid-market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Wrike or monday.com” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Smartsheet
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“they are not full MRM systems unless you are ready to build process, reporting, approvals, and financial controls around them” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Spreadsheet-like flexibility, good for complex B2B campaign timelines, but weaker on native budget tracking” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Best All-Around for Mid-Market B2B: Smartsheet ... The safest bet for a generic B2B marketing operations role” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Mid-market sweet spot: Wrike, monday work management, Teamwork.com, Smartsheet” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · first choice
“It may suit teams moving from spreadsheets who want to preserve a familiar planning model.” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
Wrike for Marketing vs monday.com Work ManagementWrike for Marketing vs SmartsheetClickUp vs monday.com Work ManagementClickUp vs Smartsheetmonday.com Work Management vs Teamwork.commonday.com Work Management vs Uptempomonday.com Work Management vs Asanamonday.com Work Management vs ScreendragonTeamwork.com vs SmartsheetUptempo vs SmartsheetAsana vs SmartsheetSmartsheet vs ScreendragonAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full marketing resource mgt standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.