Landing pages and interactive content · September 2026 Edition
Outgrow vs Landingi
Zero of twelve models named Outgrow first on the direct prompt; one named Landingi. Outgrow was named by ten of the twelve models and Landingi by eleven and Outgrow carries 10 labels and Landingi 28, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share12%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1028A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Outgrow reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Unbounce was named alongside these two in twelve of the twelve direct answers. Unbounce vs Outgrow · Unbounce vs Landingi · Carrd vs Outgrow
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the landing pages and interactive content page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OutgrowFirst choices, of twelve modelsLandingi
Direct01
Paraphrase70
Comparative00
Budget-constrained02
Scale-constrained01
Negative003 against Landingi
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Outgrow and Landingi stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Outgrow Landingi first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Outgrow on the left and Landingi on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Outgrow and Landingi stood in it.
Landingi first, Outgrow not the choice
1 of 12 modelsOutgrow was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Llama 4 MaverickLandingi alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Leadpages, Unbounce
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Qwen 3.7 FlashHubSpot Landing Pages alternatives: Landingi, Leadpages, Unbounce
GLM 4.7 FlashXUnbounce alternatives: Carrd, Instapage, Landingi, Leadpages
Neither was named
9 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Content Hub alternatives: Instapage, Leadpages, Unbounce, Webflow
GPT-5.4 miniUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Leadpages
Gemini 3.5 FlashHubSpot Content Hub, Unbounce alternatives: Instapage, Webflow
Perplexity SonarLeadpages alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage, Swipe Pages, Unbounce
Grok 4.1 FastUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage, Leadpages
Mistral SmallHubSpot Content Hub alternatives: Instapage, Leadpages, Unbounce
DeepSeek V4 FlashUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage, Leadpages, Webflow
Kimi K2Leadpages, Unbounce alternatives: Instapage, Swipe Pages
MiniMax M2.5Instapage alternatives: Leadpages, Unbounce
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Outgrow leads at mid-market.
Outgrow12%#3 of 12Landingi7%#6 of 12Enterprise
The order flips: Landingi leads at enterprise.
Landingi6%#5 of 7Outgrow4%#– of 7What the models said about Outgrow
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Recommended Interactive Content Tool: Outgrow Best all-around choice for B2B interactive content” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Outgrow is the top recommendation for B2B teams focused on lead generation.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“### Best for Mid-Sized B2B: Outgrow or involve.me” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Landingi
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Be Cautious With These Builders ... Landingi ... Friction points to watch” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Page editor can be slow, mobile editor problematic” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“BE CAUTIOUS: Landingi ... Billing practices” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Carrd (free) or Landingi (free plan + affordable paid tiers) offer the best combination of features and value” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“The best landing page builder for a mid-market B2B company is Landingi” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“My top pick for most small businesses: Landingi at $29/month” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Unbounce vs OutgrowUnbounce vs LandingiCarrd vs OutgrowCarrd vs LandingiOutgrow vs LeadpagesOutgrow vs InstapageOutgrow vs involve.meOutgrow vs HubSpot Landing PagesLeadpages vs LandingiInstapage vs LandingiLandingi vs involve.meLandingi vs HubSpot Landing PagesAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full landing pages standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.