GTM AI Index
Index Marketing Landing pages › Carrd vs Outgrow
Landing pages and interactive content · September 2026 Edition

Carrd vs Outgrow

Zero of twelve models named Carrd first on the direct prompt; zero named Outgrow. Carrd was named by twelve of the twelve models and Outgrow by ten and Carrd carries 32 labels and Outgrow 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Carrd

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Outgrow

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share12%12%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3210A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Carrd reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Unbounce was named alongside these two in twelve of the twelve direct answers. Unbounce vs Carrd · Unbounce vs Outgrow

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the landing pages and interactive content page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CarrdFirst choices, of twelve modelsOutgrow
Direct00
Paraphrase07
Comparative00
Budget-constrained70
Scale-constrained001 against Carrd
Negative402 against Carrd
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Carrd and Outgrow stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GLM 4.7 FlashXUnbounce alternatives: Carrd, Instapage, Landingi, Leadpages

Neither was named

11 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Content Hub alternatives: Instapage, Leadpages, Unbounce, Webflow
GPT-5.4 miniUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Leadpages
Gemini 3.5 FlashHubSpot Content Hub, Unbounce alternatives: Instapage, Webflow
Perplexity SonarLeadpages alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage, Swipe Pages, Unbounce
Grok 4.1 FastUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage, Leadpages
Mistral SmallHubSpot Content Hub alternatives: Instapage, Leadpages, Unbounce
DeepSeek V4 FlashUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage, Leadpages, Webflow
Llama 4 MaverickLandingi alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Leadpages, Unbounce
Qwen 3.7 FlashHubSpot Landing Pages alternatives: Landingi, Leadpages, Unbounce
Kimi K2Leadpages, Unbounce alternatives: Instapage, Swipe Pages
MiniMax M2.5Instapage alternatives: Leadpages, Unbounce

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Carrd leads by eight points.
Carrd13%#3 of 9
Outgrow6%#– of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Carrd12%#2 of 12
Outgrow12%#3 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Outgrow leads at enterprise.
Outgrow4%#– of 7
Carrd0%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Carrd

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“(Avoid Carrd/Leadpages if scaling heavy.)” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for scale: Carrd if you foresee needing more than one page or real e-commerce.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Carrd (3.1/5, but cheap at $9/year for basics—watch for data loss)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“The best landing page builder for a company with a limited budget is Carrd, as it is an ultra-affordable builder for simple, single-page sites” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Carrd (free) or Landingi (free plan + affordable paid tiers) offer the best combination of features and value” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Carrd is the undisputed champion... If you have $20 to spend for the entire year, go with Carrd.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Outgrow

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Recommended Interactive Content Tool: Outgrow Best all-around choice for B2B interactive content” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Outgrow is the top recommendation for B2B teams focused on lead generation.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“### Best for Mid-Sized B2B: Outgrow or involve.me” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.