GTM AI Index
Index Marketing Landing pages › Outgrow vs involve.me
Landing pages and interactive content · September 2026 Edition

Outgrow vs involve.me

Zero of twelve models named Outgrow first on the direct prompt; zero named involve.me. Outgrow was named by ten of the twelve models and involve.me by eight and both carry 10 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.

Outgrow

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

involve.me

accepted challenger

Vienna, Austria, founded 2016. Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share12%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1010Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Outgrow reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Unbounce was named alongside these two in twelve of the twelve direct answers. Unbounce vs Outgrow · Unbounce vs involve.me · Carrd vs Outgrow

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the landing pages and interactive content page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OutgrowFirst choices, of twelve modelsinvolve.me
Direct00
Paraphrase721 against involve.me
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Outgrow and involve.me were named in the same answer seven times, of the 25 answers naming Outgrow and the 16 naming involve.me. In those answers involve.me took the first choice two times and Outgrow three.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Outgrow and involve.me stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Outgrow involve.me first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Outgrow on the left and involve.me on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Outgrow and involve.me stood in it.

Neither was named

12 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Content Hub alternatives: Instapage, Leadpages, Unbounce, Webflow
GPT-5.4 miniUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Leadpages
Gemini 3.5 FlashHubSpot Content Hub, Unbounce alternatives: Instapage, Webflow
Perplexity SonarLeadpages alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage, Swipe Pages, Unbounce
Grok 4.1 FastUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage, Leadpages
Mistral SmallHubSpot Content Hub alternatives: Instapage, Leadpages, Unbounce
DeepSeek V4 FlashUnbounce alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Instapage, Leadpages, Webflow
Llama 4 MaverickLandingi alternatives: HubSpot Landing Pages, Leadpages, Unbounce
Qwen 3.7 FlashHubSpot Landing Pages alternatives: Landingi, Leadpages, Unbounce
Kimi K2Leadpages, Unbounce alternatives: Instapage, Swipe Pages
GLM 4.7 FlashXUnbounce alternatives: Carrd, Instapage, Landingi, Leadpages
MiniMax M2.5Instapage alternatives: Leadpages, Unbounce

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
involve.me leads by two points.
involve.me8%#– of 9
Outgrow6%#– of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Outgrow leads at mid-market.
Outgrow12%#3 of 12
involve.me4%#7 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Outgrow leads by four points.
Outgrow4%#– of 7
involve.me0%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Outgrow

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Recommended Interactive Content Tool: Outgrow Best all-around choice for B2B interactive content” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Outgrow is the top recommendation for B2B teams focused on lead generation.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“### Best for Mid-Sized B2B: Outgrow or involve.me” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about involve.me

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Solid ($29-129/mo) for quizzes/calculators on funnels, but less robust for standalone landing pages” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“### Best for Mid-Sized B2B: Outgrow or involve.me” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“involve.me for interactive content” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you want a single tool to handle interactive lead generation and follow-up emails: Go with Involve.me” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.