AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Brand protection › MarqVision vs ZeroFox
Brand protection platforms · October 2026 Edition

MarqVision vs ZeroFox

Two of fourteen models named MarqVision first on the direct prompt; one named ZeroFox. MarqVision was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and ZeroFox by fourteen and MarqVision carries 32 labels and ZeroFox 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.

MarqVision

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

ZeroFox

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%15%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels3227A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, MarqVision reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Red Points was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Red Points vs MarqVision · Red Points vs ZeroFox · BrandShield vs MarqVision

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the brand protection platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
MarqVisionFirst choices, of fourteen modelsZeroFox
Direct21
Paraphrase011 against MarqVision
Comparative22
Budget-constrained103 against MarqVision · 1 against ZeroFox
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against MarqVision · 3 against ZeroFox
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, MarqVision and ZeroFox were named in the same answer twenty-six times, of the 74 answers naming MarqVision and the 82 naming ZeroFox. In those answers ZeroFox took the first choice one time and MarqVision two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where MarqVision and ZeroFox stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
MarqVision ZeroFox first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, MarqVision on the left and ZeroFox on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where MarqVision and ZeroFox stood in it.

MarqVision first, ZeroFox not the choice

2 of 14 modelsZeroFox was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Llama 4 MaverickMarqVision alternatives: Bolster, Red Points
Qwen 3.7 FlashBolster, MarqVision alternatives: BrandVerity, Redpoints

ZeroFox first, MarqVision not the choice

1 of 14 modelsMarqVision was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashZeroFox alternatives: Bolster AI, BrandShield, Netcraft, Red Points

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarBrandShield, Red Points alternatives: Bolster, PriceSpider, TrackStreet, ZeroFox
Grok 4.1 FastBrandShield alternatives: MarqVision, Red Points, ZeroFox
Mistral SmallRed Points alternatives: BrandShield, MarqVision
GLM 4.7 FlashXRed Points alternatives: Bolster, BrandShield, ZeroFox
GPT-6 LunaBolster alternatives: Doppel, Red Points, ZeroFox
Muse Glimmer 30BBrandShield alternatives: MarqVision, Red Points

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniRed Points alternatives: BrandShield, Corsearch
DeepSeek V4 FlashRed Points alternatives: Bolster, BrandShield, Corsearch
Kimi K2Red Points alternatives: BrandVerity, Corsearch, PhishEye
MiniMax M2.5BrandShield, Red Points

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
MarqVision leads by two points.
MarqVision2%#6 of 11
ZeroFox0%#10 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
MarqVision leads by two points.
MarqVision6%#4 of 8
ZeroFox4%#5 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: ZeroFox leads at enterprise.
ZeroFox8%#4 of 8
MarqVision0%#8 of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about MarqVision

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“What to Avoid ... pricing starts at $25K–$100K/year—enterprise-focused” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“rated strongest for scale but "its custom pricing and advanced features may not be suitable for small businesses with limited budgets."” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · soft negative
“the platform can be slow to remove reported listings... This lag in enforcement could leave your brand exposed” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Select Red Points or MarqVision if you sell physical goods and are losing major revenue to unauthorized copies of your products online.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“MarqVision (Best for E-Commerce & Mid-Market Brands) ... much more affordable than legacy enterprise competitors” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“the consensus among recent reviews points to MarqVision and Bolster as the strongest fits” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about ZeroFox

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“ZeroFox ⚠️ User complaints include: Inefficient alerts ... Frequent false alarms” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Don't pay for enterprise platforms (Red Points, BrandShield, ZeroFox)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“ZeroFox ... Why to avoid: Inefficient alerts” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“ZeroFox is a top choice. It bridges the gap between traditional security and brand monitoring.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“a good "sweet spot" for a mid-sized B2B company is BrandShield or ZeroFox” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“ZeroFox is often considered the gold standard for Fortune 500 companies.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
Red Points vs MarqVisionRed Points vs ZeroFoxBrandShield vs MarqVisionBrandShield vs ZeroFoxBolster vs MarqVisionBolster vs ZeroFoxAll ten head-to-head pages and the full brand protection standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.