CustomerLabs 1PD Ops vs Prospeo
Zero of twelve models named CustomerLabs 1PD Ops first on the direct prompt; zero named Prospeo. CustomerLabs 1PD Ops was named by eight of the twelve models and Prospeo by six and both carry 11 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the identity resolution page.
By framing
CustomerLabs 1PD OpsFirst choices, of twelve modelsProspeo
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, CustomerLabs 1PD Ops and Prospeo were named in the same answer eleven times, of the 38 answers naming CustomerLabs 1PD Ops and the 53 naming Prospeo. In those answers Prospeo took the first choice three times and CustomerLabs 1PD Ops five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
CustomerLabs 1PD Ops Prospeo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, CustomerLabs 1PD Ops on the left and Prospeo on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
9 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Prospeo10%#2 of 15CustomerLabs 1PD Ops4%#7 of 15CustomerLabs 1PD Ops6%#5 of 18Prospeo4%#6 of 18CustomerLabs 1PD Ops0%#– of 13Prospeo0%#– of 13What the models said about CustomerLabs 1PD Ops
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“I'd recommend starting with CustomerLabs at $129/month if you need a complete solution” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“If you have a limited budget, CustomerLabs is your best bet.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“CustomerLabs 1PD Ops — Best Overall Value” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Prospeo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Prospeo is the safest budget-first recommendation from the results for B2B use cases” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, I recommend starting with Prospeo” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“They offer an introductory free plan (including up to 75 email resolutions/month) with low-cost scaling tiers.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.