Six of twelve models named Osano first on the direct prompt; one named Usercentrics. Both were named by all twelve models and Osano carries 42 labels and Usercentrics 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the consent and privacy management page.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Osano and Usercentrics were named in the same answer sixty-nine times, of the 114 answers naming Osano and the 98 naming Usercentrics. In those answers Usercentrics took the first choice four times and Osano six.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Osano: Free plan is limited, Plus plan starts at $239.99/month” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“if you're a larger, more heavily regulated organization... but they're usually more than a mid-sized B2B company needs” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“more enterprise-oriented, but sometimes worth comparing if you need stronger compliance workflows” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Why I'd lean Osano for many mid-market B2B firms: it explicitly positions itself as best for midsize businesses prioritizing automation in consent management” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“The best consent management platform for a mid-market B2B company is Osano, as it is best for mid-market teams scaling into a full privacy program” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Osano: *Highly recommended for mid-market.* It is incredibly easy to set up, highly automated, and includes built-in DSAR management.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Platforms with Significant Concerns... Pricing transparency issues... one review called it a "complete scam"” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid... Start at $10,000+/year with enterprise pricing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“Proceed only if you have a dedicated dev team capable of manually troubleshooting tag overrides and verifying scan accuracy weekly.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“while Usercentrics offers the best balance of features and pricing transparency for most businesses” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“Enzuzo or Usercentrics will be your best choices” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Usercentrics as the primary choice” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.