One of twelve models named Cookiebot first on the direct prompt; one named Usercentrics. Both were named by all twelve models and Cookiebot carries 43 labels and Usercentrics 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the consent and privacy management page.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Cookiebot and Usercentrics were named in the same answer fifty-nine times, of the 118 answers naming Cookiebot and the 98 naming Usercentrics. In those answers Usercentrics took the first choice two times and Cookiebot five.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“a German administrative court (Wiesbaden) ruled that a university could not use Cookiebot (a Danish CMP) because Cookiebot served its banners using Akamai” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms with Significant Concerns... Pricing transparency issues... one review called it a "complete scam"” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Pricing doubled: In August 2025, with minimal notice ... Pre-consent firing on most implementations” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Cookiebot (Essential plan at $8/month) or Enzuzo (Starter at $9/month) offer the best balance of affordability and features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Ketch, Captain Compliance, and Cookiebot were found to be strongest on consent record accuracy and audit trail management” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · first choice
“Enzuzo or Cookiebot offer the best balance of features, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Platforms with Significant Concerns... Pricing transparency issues... one review called it a "complete scam"” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid... Start at $10,000+/year with enterprise pricing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · hard negative
“Proceed only if you have a dedicated dev team capable of manually troubleshooting tag overrides and verifying scan accuracy weekly.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“while Usercentrics offers the best balance of features and pricing transparency for most businesses” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“Enzuzo or Usercentrics will be your best choices” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Usercentrics as the primary choice” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.