CookieYes vs iubenda
Zero of twelve models named CookieYes first on the direct prompt; zero named iubenda. Both were named by all twelve models and CookieYes carries 38 labels and iubenda 23, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Italy. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the consent and privacy management page.
By framing
CookieYesFirst choices, of twelve modelsiubenda
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, CookieYes and iubenda were named in the same answer forty times, of the 103 answers naming CookieYes and the 50 naming iubenda. In those answers iubenda took the first choice one time and CookieYes sixteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |
CookieYes iubenda first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, CookieYes on the left and iubenda on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
9 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
CookieYes48%#1 of 12iubenda10%#4 of 12CookieYes0%#– of 8iubenda0%#– of 8What the models said about CookieYes
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Termly / CookieYes — Fine for small businesses, but per-domain pricing and feature ceilings make them less cost-effective” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“basic plugins (like Termly or CookieYes) lack the multi-jurisdiction geo-targeting, automated workflows, and CRM integrations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“CookieYes is described as a consent-only banner tool and not suited to enterprise governance requirements.[7]” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with Termly (free up to 10K visitors) or CookieYes (free up to 5K pageviews). Both offer excellent compliance features and easy setup.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“CookieYes provides a simple, budget-friendly CMP for smaller businesses... offers a free plan, which is very practical for small businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“CookieYes is widely considered the best value-for-money CMP ... Choose CookieYes if you want the safest compliance.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about iubenda
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“good add-on docs, but scales poorly multi-domain” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“iubenda - Uses US cloud services” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd generally recommend iubenda if you want cookie consent plus broader privacy compliance in one platform” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“My Top Pick for Mid-Sized B2B: Iubenda is often the "sweet spot."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“## Top Recommendation: iubenda” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.