AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Walnut.io · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Walnut.io

4Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Walnut.io was named 2 times in Interactive demos, where Storylane led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In interactive demos · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Walnut.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Interactive demo platformsSales2%9 of 500%2under 10 labels · led by Storylane at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Walnut.io yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Walnut.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Walnut.io as the top choice for a mid-sized B2B company” MiniMax M2.5 · Interactive demos · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Walnut.io: Offers demo automation software that uses AI to speed up the process of creating interactive, clickable demos.” Llama 4 Maverick · Interactive demos · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Walnut.io, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Walnut.io was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Navattic3 of 41Not among the top eight
Storylane3 of 40Not among the top eight
Arcade2 of 41Not among the top eight
Supademo2 of 41Not among the top eight
Omedym2 of 40Not among the top eight
ScreenSpace.io2 of 40Not among the top eight
Arcade Software1 of 41Not among the top eight
Chameleon1 of 40Not among the top eight
Naoma1 of 40Not among the top eight
Pendo1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Walnut.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Walnut.io and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com4
clevera.ai3
naoma.ai3
arcade.software2
fitsmallbusiness.com2
g2.com2
guideflow.com2
layerpath.com2
storylane.io2
supademo.com2

Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Walnut.io came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

walnut.io ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Walnut.io takes 2% of first choices and Storylane takes 31%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “interactive demo platform”
2
Position for “best interactive demo platform”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 2,096 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,991 · 39 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,487
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
12 ads · 12 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2023, as WALNUT LTD, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 4 in the year, 8 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 50 in interactive demos
Segment leader
31%
Storylane
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
4 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on walnut.io
1,081
subdomains included
Content
474
counted in the table below
Documentation
485
Product · Integration
19 · 10
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog369202026-09-22CRM, Sales rooms
Report or ebook5902026-03-19
Comparison1922026-09-08Sales rooms, Sales enablement
Glossary or explainer1202025-11-05
Case study902025-10-15
Conference or event2undated
Podcast or video202024-05-02
Webinar or virtual event102023-07-04
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page walnut.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Walnut.io

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Walnut.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Walnut.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Walnut.io by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Walnut.io is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Walnut.io, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at walnut.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.