Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 27 of 38, unchanged
Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP
2Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP was named 1 time in Consent, where Osano led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business27 of 40
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market14 of 52
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In consent · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent and privacy management | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 14 of 52 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Osano at 31% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Consent · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 14 of 45, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consent | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 14 of 52, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd generally recommend Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP as the default choice” GPT-5.4 mini · Consent · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com2
enzuzo.com1
ketch.com1
learn.g2.com1
usercentrics.comYour site1
Five of the six domain citations in answers naming Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
usercentrics.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP takes 2% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.ShowHide
Search and answers
usercentrics.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP takes 2% of first choices and Osano takes 31%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “consent management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best consent management platform”
6
- Organic visits to its site
- about 67,472 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 7,627 · 678 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 60,562
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 14 clicks and $494 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 14 of 52 in consent
Segment leader
31%
Osano
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 2 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 2 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on usercentrics.com
2,267
subdomains included
Content
535
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 11
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 150 | 0 | 2025-11-10 | Tag management, Mobile apps | |
| Blog | 124 | 4 | 2026-09-25 | Consent, SEO | |
| News or press | 72 | 2 | 2026-08-27 | ||
| Conference or event | 65 | 0 | 2025-10-10 | Mobile apps | |
| Template or tool | 44 | 3 | 2026-08-24 | ||
| Case study | 37 | 1 | 2026-07-31 | ||
| Comparison | 22 | 0 | 2026-02-19 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 7 | 0 | 2025-03-04 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Resigned consent blog
- 2026-09-15What is a cmp glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-27Usercentrics cookiebot g2 leader status fall 2026 news or press
- 2026-08-24Ndpa checklist template or tool
- 2026-08-07App ad revenue consent calculator template or tool
- 2026-08-04New work web app consent management blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page usercentrics.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Usercentrics Cookiebot CMP, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.