Every category where a model named Improvely for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Click fraud protection	Marketing	4%	7 of 52	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by ClickCease at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Improvely yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Improvely across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labels3

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Improvely stands out as the best click fraud protection tool for a company with a limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Click fraud protection · budget prompt · first choice

“The Absolute Best Budget Option: Improvely” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Click fraud protection · budget prompt · first choice

“Best suited for small and medium-sized businesses, with a 14-day free trial and flexible pricing.” Mistral Small · Click fraud protection · budget prompt · alternative

“Tailored for small and medium-sized businesses” Mistral Small · Click fraud protection · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Improvely, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Improvely was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ClickCease14 of 157Not among the top eight

ClickPatrol10 of 153Not among the top eight

Fraud Blocker10 of 151Not among the top eight

ClickGUARD8 of 150Not among the top eight

Clixtell7 of 151Not among the top eight

TrafficGuard5 of 150Not among the top eight

Lunio3 of 151Not among the top eight

Cheq2 of 150Not among the top eight

Spider AF2 of 150Not among the top eight

Adjust1 of 150Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Improvely. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Improvely and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

clickpatrol.com13

guideflow.com13

spotsaas.com10

sourceforge.net9

thecmo.com9

trafficguard.ai9

clickcease.com8

lunio.ai7

softwareadvice.com7

g2.com6

Ninety-one of the ninety-one domain citations in answers naming Improvely came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

clickpatrol.com/best-click-fraud-protection-software13

guideflow.com/blog/best-click-fraud-software13

spotsaas.com/list/click-fraud-software/for-small-business10

thecmo.com/tools/best-click-fraud-software9

trafficguard.ai/blog/best-click-fraud-protection-software-protect-your-ppc-campaigns8

lunio.ai/blog/the-9-best-click-fraud-detection-tools-ranked7

softwareadvice.com/click-fraud6

improvado.io/blog/best-ad-fraud-detection-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

improvely.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Improvely takes 4% of first choices and ClickCease takes 36%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “click fraud protection tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best click fraud protection tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 140 a month (“improvely”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 217,508 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 575 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 77 · 5 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,336
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

6 ads · 6 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Awio Web Services LLC, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 52 in click fraud protection

Segment leader

36%

ClickCease

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 15 answers
Its own site cited: in 15 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on improvely.com

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	2025-11 to 2026-10	Latest	Categories named
Blog	23	0		2023-07-30

Most recent

2023-07-30Improvely is google certified blog
2022-12-04An update to the data retention policy blog
2021-06-29Automatic ssl for white label domains blog
2020-12-20Bing ads click id updates blog
2019-05-14New features custom columns new metrics blog
2018-01-02Recommendation enable adwords auto tagging blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page improvely.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Improvely

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Improvely's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Improvely, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Improvely by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Improvely is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Improvely, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.