AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Clixtell · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Clixtell

43Judge labels
7First choices
9Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Click fraud protection for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 52 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 15% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Clixtell →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In click fraud protection · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Clixtell for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Click fraud protectionMarketing6%4 of 5215%13accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Clixtell yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Clixtell across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash10012
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B11002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative12 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labels6
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need the absolute lowest monthly spend, Clixtell is the cheapest named entry in current round-ups.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Click fraud protection · budget prompt · first choice
“Clixtell at $10/month offers the best entry point if you need basic protection” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Click fraud protection · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Clixtell (from ~$10–15/month)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Click fraud protection · budget prompt · first choice
“Clixtell stands head and shoulders above the rest as the best all-in-one click fraud protection software in 2025” Muse Glimmer 30B · Click fraud protection · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“the fraud detection capabilities are more basic compared to dedicated solutions” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Click fraud protection · negative prompt · soft negative
“such as standard tiers of ClickCease, ClickGuard, or Clixtell) with caution” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Click fraud protection · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Clixtell, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Clixtell was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
DataDome8 of 431Not among the top eight
ClickGuardian7 of 431Not among the top eight
Improvely7 of 431Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Clixtell. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 43 answers that named Clixtell and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com36
lunio.ai26
clickfortify.com21
improvado.io21
clickpatrol.com20
trafficguard.ai20
mailmodo.com19
sourceforge.net19
spotsaas.com19
clickcease.com18

219 of the 219 domain citations in answers naming Clixtell came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

clixtell.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Clixtell takes 6% of first choices and ClickCease takes 36%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “click fraud protection tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best click fraud protection tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
90 a month (“clixtell”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 276 a month
Searches its site ranks for
228 · 2 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,845
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
15 ads · 15 text · 15 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as Clixtell, LLC, verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
6%
rank 4 of 52 in click fraud protection
Segment leader
36%
ClickCease
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
43 answers
Its own site cited
in 43 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on clixtell.com
437
subdomains included
Content
66
counted in the table below
Documentation
38
Product · Integration
7 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog3102026-06-28Click fraud protection
Glossary or explainer2402025-11-30
Comparison632026-07-30
News or press3undatedClick fraud protection
Report or ebook202025-11-23

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page clixtell.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Clixtell

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Clixtell's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Clixtell, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Clixtell by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Clixtell is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Clixtell, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at clixtell.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.