Every category where a model named DataDome for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Click fraud protection	Marketing	0%	16 of 52	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by ClickCease at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DataDome yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DataDome across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative11 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained8 labelsNone

Negative8 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“choose enterprise-grade, security-first platforms (like *Human Security*, *DataDome*, or *TrafficGuard*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Click fraud protection · negative prompt · first choice

“The four tools most consistently recommended for enterprise advertisers are Lunio, CHEQ, DataDome, and Anura” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Click fraud protection · scale prompt · alternative

“such as Lunio, TrafficGuard, CHEQ, DataDome, Anura, or ClickCease” Mistral Small · Click fraud protection · negative prompt · alternative

“Sophisticated bot attacks beyond ads | DataDome or HUMAN” Kimi K2 · Click fraud protection · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DataDome, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DataDome was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Lunio36 of 3820Not among the top eight

Cheq33 of 388Not among the top eight

Anura26 of 381Not among the top eight

ClickCease22 of 382Not among the top eight

TrafficGuard22 of 382Not among the top eight

ClickGUARD21 of 380Not among the top eight

Fraud Blocker12 of 381Not among the top eight

HUMAN Security9 of 380Not among the top eight

Clixtell8 of 380Not among the top eight

ClickPatrol7 of 380Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DataDome. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 38 answers that named DataDome and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

lunio.ai38

guideflow.com26

clickpatrol.com23

joindatacops.com17

us.fitgap.com17

improvado.io16

geetest.com15

gitnux.org15

trafficguard.ai15

adsafee.com14

No domain is on file for DataDome, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

lunio.ai/blog/best-click-fraud-detection-tools-for-enterprise-advertisers34

lunio.ai/blog/the-9-best-click-fraud-detection-tools-ranked28

guideflow.com/blog/best-click-fraud-software25

improvado.io/blog/best-ad-fraud-detection-software16

us.fitgap.com/search/click-fraud-software/enterprise16

geetest.com/en/article/click-fraud-prevention-tools15

adsafee.com/blog/en/best-click-fraud-protection-software-202613

clickguardian.ai/blog/best-click-fraud-protection11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where DataDome stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 1,900 a month (“datadome”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 33 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 16 of 52 in click fraud protection

Segment leader

36%

ClickCease

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 38 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow DataDome

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DataDome's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DataDome, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DataDome by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where DataDome is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name DataDome, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.