Every category where a model named HUMAN Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Click fraud protection	Marketing	2%	13 of 52	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by ClickCease at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HUMAN Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HUMAN Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labels3

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“choose enterprise-grade, security-first platforms (like *Human Security*, *DataDome*, or *TrafficGuard*) that focus on deep cryptographic device fingerprinting” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Click fraud protection · negative prompt · first choice

“Best all-around for mid-market B2B: HUMAN Security if you want a dedicated, enterprise-grade invalid-traffic / bot-fraud stack” GPT-5.4 mini · Click fraud protection · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“HUMAN Security for programmatic buyers who need MRC-accredited pre-bid filtering” Muse Glimmer 30B · Click fraud protection · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“CHEQ or HUMAN Security are enterprise-grade cybersecurity tools” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Click fraud protection · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HUMAN Security, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HUMAN Security was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cheq18 of 267Not among the top eight

Lunio17 of 268Not among the top eight

TrafficGuard14 of 261Not among the top eight

ClickGUARD13 of 262Not among the top eight

DoubleVerify13 of 261Not among the top eight

ClickCease12 of 262Not among the top eight

DataDome9 of 261Not among the top eight

Anura7 of 262Not among the top eight

Integral Ad Science7 of 260Not among the top eight

Fraud Blocker6 of 260Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HUMAN Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 26 answers that named HUMAN Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

lunio.ai20

trafficguard.ai16

guideflow.com15

clickpatrol.com14

joindatacops.com11

sourceforge.net11

adsafee.com10

improvado.io10

clickcease.com9

clickfortify.com9

125 of the 125 domain citations in answers naming HUMAN Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/best-click-fraud-software15

lunio.ai/blog/best-click-fraud-detection-tools-for-enterprise-advertisers15

lunio.ai/blog/the-9-best-click-fraud-detection-tools-ranked15

trafficguard.ai/blog/best-click-fraud-protection-software-protect-your-ppc-campaigns11

adsafee.com/blog/en/best-click-fraud-protection-software-20269

clickpatrol.com/best-click-fraud-protection-software9

improvado.io/blog/best-ad-fraud-detection-software9

joindatacops.com/resources/enterprise-click-fraud-protection9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

humansecurity.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, HUMAN Security takes 2% of first choices and ClickCease takes 36%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “click fraud protection tool”

Position for “best click fraud protection tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,300 a month (“human security”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 408 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 165,749 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 6,795 · 230 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 4,987
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

57 ads · 53 text, 2 image, 2 video · 23 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2023, as HUMAN SECURITY, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 33 in the year, 24 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 13 of 52 in click fraud protection

Segment leader

36%

ClickCease

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 26 answers
Its own site cited: in 25 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on humansecurity.com

1,534

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

1,510

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	2025-10 to 2026-09	Latest	Categories named
Conference or event	19	0		2025-11-01

Most recent

2025-11-0112 conference or event

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page humansecurity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as HUMAN Security

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HUMAN Security; a claim can dispute any of them.

Human Security 1

Follow HUMAN Security

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Q140700188 is the company behind HUMAN Security.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: humansecurity.com
Headquarters: United States

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Cybersecurity company that safeguards enterprises and internet platforms from sophisticated bot attacks, fraud, and account abuse.
humansecurity.com
For: enterprises and internet platforms
humansecurity.com
Customers named: TripleLiftVenatus MediaSweetwaterSamsonitePriceline
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What HUMAN Security's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: humansecurity.com, trust.humansecurity.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HUMAN Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HUMAN Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HUMAN Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where HUMAN Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name HUMAN Security, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.