AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › GeoPostcodes · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

GeoPostcodes

11Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Address verification for enterprise buyers
Rank 36 of 108 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In address verification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named GeoPostcodes for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Address verification toolsGTM data and infrastructure0%36 of 1080%1under 10 labels · led by Smarty at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for GeoPostcodes yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated GeoPostcodes across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Self-hosted global postal databases for on-premise setups.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Address verification · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as GeoPostcodes, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GeoPostcodes was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Smarty10 of 116Not among the top eight
PostGrid Address Verification6 of 111Not among the top eight
Melissa5 of 112Not among the top eight
BatchData3 of 110Not among the top eight
Lob3 of 110Not among the top eight
Loqate3 of 110Not among the top eight
OpenStreetMap3 of 110Not among the top eight
Informatica DaaS2 of 112Not among the top eight
Experian Data Quality2 of 110Not among the top eight
Melissa Global Address Verification2 of 110Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GeoPostcodes. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named GeoPostcodes and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

geopostcodes.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, GeoPostcodes takes 0% of first choices and Smarty takes 47%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “address verification tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best address verification tool”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
140 a month (“geopostcodes”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 136,137 a month
Searches its site ranks for
13,422 · 602 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,618
Paid Google search
8 searches its ads show for, about 90 clicks and $251 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
77 ads · 44 image, 33 text · 25 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2021, as GeoPostcodes, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 26 in the year, 51 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 36 of 108 in address verification
Segment leader
47%
Smarty
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
11 answers
Its own site cited
in 11 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on geopostcodes.com
2,126
subdomains included
Content
357
counted in the table below
Documentation
124
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog26922026-09-08CRM, Address verification
Glossary or explainer5812026-10-02Address verification
Comparison3002026-04-08
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page geopostcodes.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow GeoPostcodes

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GeoPostcodes's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GeoPostcodes, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for GeoPostcodes by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where GeoPostcodes is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name GeoPostcodes, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at geopostcodes.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.