Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 of 51, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedFindymail
12Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Findymail was named 5 times in Email verification and 1 other category, where ZeroBounce led with 42%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business19 of 56
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market10 of 65
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise44 of 52
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In email verification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Findymail for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email verification | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 10 of 65 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by ZeroBounce at 42% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Sales intelligence and contact data | Sales | 0% | 32 of 52 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Findymail held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Email verification · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 11 of 61, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 38 → 42 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email verification | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 10 of 65, unchanged |
| Sales intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 52, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Findymail across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Findymail across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the most recommended email list validation tools are ZeroBounce, Bouncer, and Findymail” Mistral Small · Email verification · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best for High-Volume List Building & Clay Workflows: Findymail ... has emerged as a favorite” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email verification · direct prompt · alternative
“3. Findymail (Best for B2B Workflow)” MiniMax M2.5 · Email verification · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Findymail, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Findymail was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Findymail, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Findymail was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Findymail. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Findymail and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
findymail.comYour site4
pipeline.zoominfo.com4
sender.net4
alexberman.com3
cleanlist.ai3
hunter.io3
reddit.com3
usebouncer.com3
ai-ark.com2
allegrow.co2
Twenty-seven of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Findymail came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on findymail.com
250
subdomains included
Content
206
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 13
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 157 | undated | CRM, Enrichment | ||
| Comparison | 27 | undated | CRM, Enrichment | ||
| Case study | 12 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | undated | CRM, Enrichment | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page findymail.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CRM (15); 0 name its categories the models place it in. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Findymail
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Findymail is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Findymail is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Email Finder & B2B Data Platform
- For
- B2B teams and agencies running targeted outbound at scale
- Price stated
- Free Trial $0; Basic Plan $49/month; Starter Plan $99/month; Business Plan $249/month; Business Plus Plan $399/month; Scale 50K Plan $549/month; Scale 100K Plan $849/month findymail.com
- Starting price
- 0 findymail.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free account with 10 credits to start. No credit card required. findymail.com
- Integrations claimed
- 5000 findymail.com · 10 findymail.com/pricing pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2GDPR compliant
- Hosting
- EU
- Customers named
- AIGROWTHHUBAAIWPlainly VideosBePerpetualNiche LeadsLeadBullTapefluxGrowthEngineX
What Findymail's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: findymail.com, findymail.com/pricing, findymail.com/customers, findymail.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Findymail's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Findymail, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Findymail by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Findymail is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Findymail, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.