GTM AI Index

Index › Products › EasyPost · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

EasyPost

7Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. EasyPost was named 2 times in Address verification, where Smarty led with 47%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business6 of 81

under the label threshold

Mid-market71 of 108

under the label threshold

Enterprise26 of 84

under the label threshold

In address verification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named EasyPost for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Address verification tools	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	71 of 108	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Smarty at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EasyPost yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EasyPost across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for E-commerce & Integrated Shipping” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Address verification · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Not standalone-focused (shipping-centric), variable international | Good if you ship frequently, less ideal for pure lead validation” Grok 4.1 Fast · Address verification · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EasyPost, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EasyPost was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Smarty6 of 74Not among the top eight

Lob4 of 70Not among the top eight

PostGrid Address Verification4 of 70Not among the top eight

Google Maps2 of 70Not among the top eight

Geocodio1 of 71Not among the top eight

USPS Address API1 of 71Not among the top eight

Experian Data Quality1 of 70Not among the top eight

Geoapify1 of 70Not among the top eight

Google Address Validation API1 of 70Not among the top eight

Google Maps Address Validation1 of 70Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EasyPost. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named EasyPost and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

smarty.com7

atoship.com4

melissa.com4

postgrid.com4

batchdata.io3

easypost.comYour site3

gitnux.org3

guideflow.com3

ourcodeworld.com3

softwareadvice.com3

Thirty-four of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming EasyPost came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

atoship.com/blog/address-verification-apis-usps-google-smartystreets4

batchdata.io/blog/best-address-verification-apis-2026-complete-comparison-guide3

easypost.com/address-verification-api3

guideflow.com/blog/address-verification-software3

ourcodeworld.com/articles/read/3580/best-address-validation-apis-for-developers-and-busine3

postgrid.com/address-verification-software/best-address-verification-software3

smarty.com/compare/google-address-validation-alternatives3

smarty.com/compare/melissa-address-validation-alternatives3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow EasyPost

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EasyPost's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EasyPost, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for EasyPost by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where EasyPost is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name EasyPost, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.