GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Atlan · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Atlan

11Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Atlan was named 4 times in DMP, where Segment led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business155 of 213

under the label threshold

Mid-market43 of 183

under the label threshold

Enterprise32 of 174

under the label threshold

In dmp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Atlan for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data management platforms	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	43 of 183	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Segment at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Atlan yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Atlan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Active/AI metadata, good for technical + business users” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DMP · comparative prompt · alternative

“Governance? Collibra/Atlan.” Grok 4.1 Fast · DMP · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Atlan, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Atlan was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Alation10 of 110Not in the top three

Collibra10 of 110Not in the top three

Snowflake8 of 114Not in the top three

Microsoft Purview8 of 110Not in the top three

Databricks7 of 112Not in the top three

BigQuery7 of 111Not in the top three

Fivetran7 of 111Not in the top three

Informatica IDMC6 of 111Not in the top three

Microsoft Fabric6 of 110Not in the top three

Reltio5 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Atlan. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 11 answers that named Atlan and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fortegrp.com2

tinybird.co2

alation.com1

clicdata.com1

cnicsolutions.com1

datalakeclub.com1

domo.com1

estuary.dev1

gartner.com1

grow.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Atlan came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

fortegrp.com/insights/top-19-data-management-tools-platforms-in-the-usa2

tinybird.co/blog/Data-Management-Platforms2

alation.com/blog/data-management-software1

clicdata.com/blog/best-data-management-software-for-smbs1

cnicsolutions.com/cybersecurity-threat-protection/best-mdm-solutions-small-business1

datalakeclub.com/best-data-management-platforms-for-startups1

domo.com/learn/article/best-data-management-platforms1

estuary.dev/blog/data-management-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Atlan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Atlan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at atlantsecurity.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.