AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Astro · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Astro

17Judge labels
2First choices
4Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Astro was named 5 times in App store optimization, where AppTweak led with 39%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In app store optimization · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Astro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
App store optimization toolsMarketing2%12 of 5620%5under 10 labels · led by AppTweak at 39%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Astro yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Astro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative3 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Astro / AstroASO – best ultra-cheap iOS keyword tool.” Muse Glimmer 30B · App store optimization · budget prompt · first choice
“start with lightweight, budget-friendly, or indie-focused rank trackers (such as Astro, ASOMobile, or entry-level tiers of AppTweak/ASOdesk)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · App store optimization · negative prompt · alternative
“(e.g., AppTweak, AppFollow, Astro for low-cost keyword work)” Grok 4.1 Fast · App store optimization · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“for example, Astro is Apple-only, so it is a poor fit if you publish on both the App Store and Google Play” Perplexity Sonar · App store optimization · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Astro, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Astro was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
AppTweak13 of 172Not among the top eight
App Radar12 of 173Not among the top eight
Appfigures10 of 174Not among the top eight
Sensor Tower9 of 171Not among the top eight
AppFollow9 of 170Not among the top eight
MobileAction7 of 171Not among the top eight
ASOMobile6 of 171Not among the top eight
ASO World3 of 170Not among the top eight
AppDrift3 of 170Not among the top eight
Applyra3 of 170Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Astro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Astro and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appdrift.co12
appfollow.io10
appradar.com10
g2.com9
refined.so9
webseotrends.com9
asomobile.net8
businessofapps.com6
strataigize.com6
theapplaunchpad.com6

Eighty-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming Astro came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on astro.build
396
subdomains included
Content
223
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
25 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog19662026-09-03
News or press19undated
Case study712026-09-08
Glossary or explainer1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page astro.build exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Astro

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Astro; a claim can dispute any of them.
Astro / AstroASO 1

Follow Astro

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Astro.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Astro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Astro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Astro by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Astro is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Astro, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at astro.build is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.