GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging

1Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging was named 1 time in In-app messaging, where Intercom led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market48 of 113

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In in-app messaging · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
In-app messaging and customer communications	Customer	0%	48 of 113	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Good for: AWS-centric teams that want messaging integrated with cloud infrastructure.” GPT-5.4 mini · In-app messaging · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Braze1 of 11Not in the top three

Airship1 of 10Not in the top three

Customer.io1 of 10Not in the top three

Firebase In-App Messaging1 of 10Not in the top three

OneSignal1 of 10Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

airship.com1

braze.com1

docs.aws.amazon.comYour site1

docs.customer.io1

documentation.onesignal.com1

firebase.google.com1

Five of the six domain citations in answers naming Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

airship.com/docs/guides/features/messaging1

airship.com/docs/guides/features/messaging/in-app-messages1

braze.com/product/mobile-app-messaging1

docs.aws.amazon.com/pdfs/pinpoint/latest/userguide/pinpoint-ug.pdf1

docs.customer.io/messaging/channels/in-app/getting-started1

documentation.onesignal.com/docs/en/in-app-messages-setup1

firebase.google.com/docs/in-app-messaging1

firebase.google.com/products/in-app-messaging1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Amazon Europe Core is the company behind Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging.

Website: amazon.com
Headquarters: Seattle, United States
Founded: 1994
Employees: about 1,500,000 (2023)
Ownership: Public, AMZN on Nasdaq

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Amazon Pinpoint / AWS End User Messaging, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at amazon.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.