GTM AI Index
Index Sales Sales rooms › GetAccept vs HummingDeck
Digital sales rooms · September 2026 Edition

GetAccept vs HummingDeck

One of twelve models named GetAccept first on the direct prompt; zero named HummingDeck. GetAccept was named by twelve of the twelve models and HummingDeck by nine and GetAccept carries 49 labels and HummingDeck 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.

GetAccept

accepted challenger

founded 2015. Named in four categories this edition.

HummingDeck

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share8%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate20%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels4917A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, GetAccept reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Trumpet was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Aligned vs GetAccept · Aligned vs HummingDeck · Trumpet vs GetAccept

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital sales rooms page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GetAcceptFirst choices, of twelve modelsHummingDeck
Direct10
Paraphrase30
Comparative10
Budget-constrained045 against GetAccept
Scale-constrained00
Negative105 against GetAccept
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where GetAccept and HummingDeck stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GetAccept HummingDeck first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, GetAccept on the left and HummingDeck on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where GetAccept and HummingDeck stood in it.

GetAccept first, HummingDeck not the choice

1 of 12 modelsHummingDeck was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallGetAccept alternatives: Aligned, Dock, Trumpet

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Trumpet alternatives: Aligned, Dock, Flowla, GetAccept
Gemini 3.5 FlashAligned, Trumpet alternatives: DealHub, Dock, GetAccept
Perplexity SonarTrumpet alternatives: Aligned, Dock, GetAccept
Grok 4.1 FastTrumpet alternatives: Aligned, GetAccept
DeepSeek V4 FlashAligned alternatives: Dock, GetAccept, HummingDeck, Trumpet
Kimi K2Trumpet alternatives: Aligned, Dock, GetAccept, HummingDeck
GLM 4.7 FlashXAligned, Trumpet alternatives: DealHub, GetAccept, HummingDeck
MiniMax M2.5Aligned, Trumpet alternatives: Dock, GetAccept

Neither was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniAligned alternatives: DealHub, Dock, Showpad
Llama 4 MaverickTrumpet
Qwen 3.7 FlashSeismic alternatives: Highspot, Qwilr, Spotio

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
HummingDeck leads by two points.
HummingDeck8%#4 of 9
GetAccept6%#6 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
GetAccept8%#3 of 14
HummingDeck8%#4 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: GetAccept leads at enterprise.
GetAccept2%#9 of 12
HummingDeck0%#– of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about GetAccept

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Trustpilot Rating: 1.7/5 (marked as "Bad")... Platform filled with bugs and usability problems” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid platforms like Dock, GetAccept, or Highspot for a limited budget” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“GetAccept - Due to Trustpilot vs G2 rating discrepancy and contract issues” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Best Overall: GetAccept ... GetAccept offers the most complete solution for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend GetAccept as a strong starting point for buyer engagement and deal room functionality.” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“GetAccept: Best all-in-one solution with native e-signatures and AI features” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about HummingDeck

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“If you want the absolute lowest entry price for a paid plan, go with HummingDeck” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“### Top Recommendation: HummingDeck (Best overall for budget-conscious small teams)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“HummingDeck ($25/user/mo) - Best overall value” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.