GTM AI Index
Index Sales Sales rooms › Flowla vs Dock
Digital sales rooms · September 2026 Edition

Flowla vs Dock

Zero of twelve models named Flowla first on the direct prompt; zero named Dock. Both were named by all twelve models and Flowla carries 35 labels and Dock 45, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Flowla

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Dock

accepted challenger

San Francisco, United States, founded 2021. Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share6%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%20%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels3545A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Flowla reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Trumpet was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Aligned vs Flowla · Aligned vs Dock · Trumpet vs Flowla

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital sales rooms page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FlowlaFirst choices, of twelve modelsDock
Direct00
Paraphrase13
Comparative01
Budget-constrained205 against Dock
Scale-constrained00
Negative013 against Flowla · 4 against Dock
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Flowla and Dock were named in the same answer seventy times, of the 93 answers naming Flowla and the 208 naming Dock. In those answers Dock took the first choice seven times and Flowla eight.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Flowla and Dock stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Flowla Dock first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Flowla on the left and Dock on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Flowla and Dock stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Trumpet alternatives: Aligned, Dock, Flowla, GetAccept
GPT-5.4 miniAligned alternatives: DealHub, Dock, Showpad
Gemini 3.5 FlashAligned, Trumpet alternatives: DealHub, Dock, GetAccept
Perplexity SonarTrumpet alternatives: Aligned, Dock, GetAccept
Mistral SmallGetAccept alternatives: Aligned, Dock, Trumpet
DeepSeek V4 FlashAligned alternatives: Dock, GetAccept, HummingDeck, Trumpet
Kimi K2Trumpet alternatives: Aligned, Dock, GetAccept, HummingDeck
MiniMax M2.5Aligned, Trumpet alternatives: Dock, GetAccept

Neither was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Grok 4.1 FastTrumpet alternatives: Aligned, GetAccept
Llama 4 MaverickTrumpet
Qwen 3.7 FlashSeismic alternatives: Highspot, Qwilr, Spotio
GLM 4.7 FlashXAligned, Trumpet alternatives: DealHub, GetAccept, HummingDeck

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Flowla leads by six points.
Flowla13%#3 of 9
Dock8%#5 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Flowla6%#5 of 14
Dock6%#6 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Dock leads at enterprise.
Dock12%#6 of 12
Flowla0%#12 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Flowla

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“The rigid step dependencies can frustrate fast-moving buyers and require significant backend management from operations teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“as a newer platform, its feature set is still maturing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Other Platforms to Be Cautious About:... Flowla” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with Flowla's free plan if you want to test digital sales rooms with zero commitment” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick one for a typical mid-sized B2B company: I'd recommend Flowla” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Flowla the stronger pick if you want the easiest low-friction entry” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Dock

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Avoid platforms like Dock, GetAccept, or Highspot for a limited budget” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Budget concerns - paid plans reportedly start around $350/month for 5 users” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid platforms like Dock ($350/month minimum)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Dock is often cited as the most flexible platform... treats the sales room as a workspace that transitions seamlessly into onboarding” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.