Two of twelve models named Qwilr first on the direct prompt; zero named Better Proposals. Both were named by all twelve models and Qwilr carries 44 labels and Better Proposals 34, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Redfern, Australia, founded 2014. Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the proposal software page.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Qwilr and Better Proposals were named in the same answer seventy times, of the 124 answers naming Qwilr and the 100 naming Better Proposals. In those answers Better Proposals took the first choice eight times and Qwilr two.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“Tools like Qwilr are incredibly modern... However, they require caution depending on your industry.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Limited template library; fewer automation options; limited integrations compared to competitors” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious of general-purpose platforms like Proposify, Qwilr, and PandaDoc” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, PandaDoc or Qwilr offer the best balance of features, pricing, and scalability.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Proposify or Qwilr are the strongest starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Qwilr or GetAccept if a WOW-factor buyer experience is central to your sales motion” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Better Proposals — Highest Concern ... Vendor lock-in / data hostage ... Fake/misleading integrations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“HIGH RISK - Avoid These Tools ... 1. Better Proposals” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“some users have raised ethical concerns in reviews regarding how the company handled early adopters who pre-paid for lifetime accounts” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“the best choice is usually Better Proposals if you want a focused proposal tool” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Better Proposals is an industry favorite. * The Catch: The budget-friendly Starter plan caps you at 5 active proposals” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for freelancers: Better Proposals ($13–$21/month) - combines proposals, signatures, and payments.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.