Fourteen of fourteen models named PandaDoc first on the direct prompt; zero named Better Proposals. Both were named by all fourteen models and PandaDoc carries 72 labels and Better Proposals 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.
South San Francisco, United States, founded 2013. Named in seven categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the proposal software page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, PandaDoc and Better Proposals were named in the same answer 123 times, of the 559 answers naming PandaDoc and the 133 naming Better Proposals. In those answers Better Proposals took the first choice twelve times and PandaDoc sixty.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“Avoid PandaDoc if mobile experience or complex editing is critical” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“All-round revenue/enterprise teams | All-in-one: templates, content library, analytics, payments, CPQ... Choose ... PandaDoc if Salesforce-heavy” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“PandaDoc is the best default choice because it is repeatedly positioned as an all-in-one proposal platform for small-to-mid-market teams” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“1. PandaDoc 🏆 ... Differentiator: The broadest platform—if you need one tool for proposals, contracts, and payments, this is it.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Why to avoid: Users frequently complain that the software is "terrible" and "complicated."” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“This tool consistently shows the most negative feedback across platforms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“I didn’t pull a current official pricing/features page in this pass, so I’d be cautious about specifics without checking their site directly.” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Prospero at ~$12/mo annual and Better Proposals at $13/mo annual are the most commonly cited best value paid options.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“For a budget under $300/month, Better Proposals or Prospero are recommended options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“PandaDoc and Better Proposals are often recommended as the best options” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.