Viral Loops vs Referral Factory
Zero of twelve models named Viral Loops first on the direct prompt; zero named Referral Factory. Viral Loops was named by ten of the twelve models and Referral Factory by nine and Viral Loops carries 20 labels and Referral Factory 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the referral and partner programs page.
By framing
Viral LoopsFirst choices, of twelve modelsReferral Factory
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Viral Loops and Referral Factory were named in the same answer twenty-six times, of the 50 answers naming Viral Loops and the 116 naming Referral Factory. In those answers Referral Factory took the first choice three times and Viral Loops two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
Viral Loops Referral Factory first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Viral Loops on the left and Referral Factory on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
11 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Referral Factory9%#5 of 12Viral Loops0%#10 of 12Viral Loops4%#5 of 11Referral Factory2%#7 of 11Referral Factory6%#5 of 13Viral Loops0%#– of 13What the models said about Viral Loops
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Multiple reports of billing issues ... 1-star reviews highlight "deceptive practices" and "waste of money."[” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“aimed at B2C viral loops and pre-launch waitlists, not ongoing B2B referral operations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“*Caution for cash reward programs* — No automated fraud detection” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with Viral Loops - it offers the best combination of affordability ($35/month), comprehensive features, and a solid free trial period.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“ReferralCandy or Viral Loops offer the best balance of features and ease of use” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Viral Loops (≈$35/month) is the best all-around value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Referral Factory
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“*Caution for high-value or cash reward programs* — No automated fraud screening” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Referral Factory & Viral Loops (Missing Critical Features)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“single best answer for most companies with a limited budget, I'd pick Referral Factory for general use” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Referral Factory for fast no-code setup” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.