AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Partner and channel › Referrals › Smile.io vs Ambassador
Referral and partner programs · October 2026 Edition

Smile.io vs Ambassador

Zero of fourteen models named Smile.io first on the direct prompt; two named Ambassador. Smile.io was named by ten of the fourteen models and Ambassador by ten and Smile.io carries 10 labels and Ambassador 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Smile.io

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Ambassador

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share13%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%6%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#8A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1016A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Smile.io reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Referral Rock was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. PartnerStack vs Smile.io · PartnerStack vs Ambassador · Referral Rock vs Smile.io

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the referral and partner programs page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Smile.ioFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAmbassador
Direct02
Paraphrase00
Comparative001 against Ambassador
Budget-constrained70
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Smile.io and Ambassador stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Smile.io Ambassador first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Smile.io on the left and Ambassador on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Smile.io and Ambassador stood in it.

Ambassador first, Smile.io not the choice

2 of 14 modelsSmile.io was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.1 FastAmbassador alternatives: PartnerStack, Referral Rock
Muse Glimmer 30BAmbassador alternatives: Extole, PartnerStack, Partnerize, Referral Rock

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniReferral Factory alternatives: Ambassador, PartnerStack, Referral Rock, impact.com
Perplexity SonarReferral Rock alternatives: Ambassador, CustomerGauge, GrowSurf, Referral Factory
DeepSeek V4 FlashCello, Referral Rock alternatives: Ambassador, GrowSurf, PartnerStack
GLM 4.7 FlashXCello alternatives: Ambassador, Extole, Referral Factory, Referral Rock
MiniMax M2.5Referral Rock alternatives: Ambassador, Friendbuy, PartnerStack

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Cello alternatives: Friendbuy, PartnerStack, Referral Rock
Gemini 3.5 FlashReferral Rock alternatives: GrowSurf, PartnerStack, Referral Factory, impact.com Advocate
Mistral SmallReferral Rock alternatives: SaaSquatch
Llama 4 MaverickFriendbuy alternatives: Partnero, Referral Rock, SaaSquatch
Qwen 3.7 FlashPartnerStack alternatives: Cello.so, Partnero
Kimi K2Referral Rock alternatives: FirstPromoter, PartnerStack
GPT-6 LunaSaaSquatch alternatives: PartnerStack, Referral Rock

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Smile.io leads by two points.
Smile.io2%#– of 10
Ambassador0%#– of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Smile.io leads by nine points.
Smile.io13%#3 of 15
Ambassador4%#8 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Ambassador leads at enterprise.
Ambassador20%#2 of 12
Smile.io0%#– of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Smile.io

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Ambassador

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Expensive, requires sales/contract/setup fee; overkill for SMBs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Start with Ambassador if you prioritize B2B depth, integrations, and proven mid-market ROI (top G2 leader).” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · first choice
“Ambassador – Best overall for B2B SaaS / enterprise advocacy” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.