Channeltivity vs Mindmatrix
Zero of twelve models named Channeltivity first on the direct prompt; zero named Mindmatrix. Channeltivity was named by nine of the twelve models and Mindmatrix by eight and Channeltivity carries 16 labels and Mindmatrix 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the channel partner and local marketing page.
By framing
ChanneltivityFirst choices, of twelve modelsMindmatrix
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Channeltivity and Mindmatrix were named in the same answer twenty-six times, of the 122 answers naming Channeltivity and the 63 naming Mindmatrix. In those answers Mindmatrix took the first choice zero times and Channeltivity two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Channeltivity Mindmatrix first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Channeltivity on the left and Mindmatrix on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Channeltivity6%#7 of 15Mindmatrix2%#8 of 15Channeltivity6%#4 of 9Mindmatrix2%#7 of 9Channeltivity0%#– of 9Mindmatrix0%#7 of 9What the models said about Channeltivity
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“it is not a true TCMA platform” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Channeltivity is a market favorite... It is highly intuitive and doesn't require a full-time IT admin” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Mindmatrix
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“TCMA module is often described as "the weakest leg"” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“without enterprise-level costs (typically $1,500–$5,000+/month for options like ... Mindmatrix)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“a common user complaint centers on the platform's UI/UX, especially on mobile devices” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for: Comprehensive through-channel marketing automation (TCMA) and highly localized campaign execution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best Value: Mindmatrix ... gives you a meaningful TCMA capability without jumping to enterprise-scale costs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
“The unified Partner Operating System combining PRM, TCMA, and Direct Sales Enablement.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.