Channeltivity vs Impartner
Zero of twelve models named Channeltivity first on the direct prompt; zero named Impartner. Channeltivity was named by nine of the twelve models and Impartner by ten and Channeltivity carries 16 labels and Impartner 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the channel partner and local marketing page.
By framing
ChanneltivityFirst choices, of twelve modelsImpartner
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Channeltivity and Impartner were named in the same answer sixty-eight times, of the 122 answers naming Channeltivity and the 198 naming Impartner. In those answers Impartner took the first choice nine times and Channeltivity fifteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Channeltivity Impartner first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Channeltivity on the left and Impartner on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Channeltivity6%#7 of 15Impartner0%#15 of 15Channeltivity6%#4 of 9Impartner2%#8 of 9Impartner22%#1 of 9Channeltivity0%#– of 9What the models said about Channeltivity
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“it is not a true TCMA platform” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Channeltivity is a market favorite... It is highly intuitive and doesn't require a full-time IT admin” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Impartner
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Beware the enterprise trap — platforms like Impartner ($25K+/year) ... completely unsuitable for a limited budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Heavy enterprise suites (Impartner, Salesforce PRM) unless you have dedicated channel ops resources” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · hard negative
“Considered "Enterprise-grade" which means it "should be avoided on a limited budget"” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Forrester's evaluations consistently place Zift (Unifyr), ZINFI, and Impartner at the top” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Impartner is widely considered the market leader for large, complex organizations.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.