Channel partner and local marketing · September 2026 Edition
PartnerStack vs Mindmatrix
Zero of twelve models named PartnerStack first on the direct prompt; zero named Mindmatrix. PartnerStack was named by nine of the twelve models and Mindmatrix by eight and PartnerStack carries 11 labels and Mindmatrix 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in six categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share6%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate18%16%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels1119A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, PartnerStack reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Unifyr was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. JourneyBee vs PartnerStack · JourneyBee vs Mindmatrix · Channelscaler vs PartnerStack
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the channel partner and local marketing page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PartnerStackFirst choices, of twelve modelsMindmatrix
Direct00
Paraphrase312 against PartnerStack
Comparative00
Budget-constrained001 against Mindmatrix
Scale-constrained00
Negative002 against Mindmatrix
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where PartnerStack and Mindmatrix stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
PartnerStack Mindmatrix first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, PartnerStack on the left and Mindmatrix on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where PartnerStack and Mindmatrix stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice alternatives: Channelscaler, PartnerStack, Structured, Unifyr, ZINFI
Gemini 3.5 FlashChannelscaler alternatives: Mindmatrix, ZINFI, xAmplify
Grok 4.1 FastChannelscaler alternatives: Channeltivity, JourneyBee, Mindmatrix, Unifyr
DeepSeek V4 FlashJourneyBee alternatives: Channelscaler, Mindmatrix, Unifyr
GLM 4.7 FlashXUnifyr alternatives: Channelscaler, Channeltivity, Impartner, Mindmatrix
MiniMax M2.5JourneyBee alternatives: Channeltivity, Mindmatrix, Unifyr, ZINFI Unified Partner Management
Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniHubSpot Marketing Hub alternatives: Adobe Marketo Engage
Perplexity SonarUnifyr alternatives: Channeltivity, HubSpot Marketing Hub, JourneyBee
Mistral SmallJourneyBee, Unifyr alternatives: Channelscaler
Llama 4 MaverickHey Sid alternatives: AdRoll ABM, HubSpot Marketing Hub
Qwen 3.7 FlashChannelscaler alternatives: Impartner, PartnerCenterOne
Kimi K2Unifyr alternatives: Channeltivity, JourneyBee, ZINFI, xAmplify
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
PartnerStack leads by six points.
PartnerStack8%#5 of 15Mindmatrix2%#8 of 15Mid-marketThe figures above
PartnerStack leads by four points.
PartnerStack6%#5 of 9Mindmatrix2%#7 of 9Enterprise
PartnerStack leads by two points.
PartnerStack2%#– of 9Mindmatrix0%#7 of 9What the models said about PartnerStack
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“PartnerStack if you're a B2B software company and want a partner ecosystem platform that's strong on scaling recruitment, management, and payouts” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Mindmatrix
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“TCMA module is often described as "the weakest leg"” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“without enterprise-level costs (typically $1,500–$5,000+/month for options like ... Mindmatrix)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“a common user complaint centers on the platform's UI/UX, especially on mobile devices” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best for: Comprehensive through-channel marketing automation (TCMA) and highly localized campaign execution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best Value: Mindmatrix ... gives you a meaningful TCMA capability without jumping to enterprise-scale costs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · alternative
“The unified Partner Operating System combining PRM, TCMA, and Direct Sales Enablement.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
JourneyBee vs PartnerStackJourneyBee vs MindmatrixChannelscaler vs PartnerStackChannelscaler vs MindmatrixUnifyr vs PartnerStackUnifyr vs MindmatrixChanneltivity vs PartnerStackChanneltivity vs MindmatrixPartnerStack vs ZINFIPartnerStack vs ImpartnerZINFI vs MindmatrixMindmatrix vs ImpartnerAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full channel marketing standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.