AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Mobile apps › Braze vs Iterable
Mobile apps · October 2026 Edition

Braze vs Iterable

Two of fourteen models named Braze first on the direct prompt; one named Iterable. Braze was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Iterable by seven and Braze carries 43 labels and Iterable 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Braze

criticized challenger

New York City, United States, founded 2011. Named in eleven categories this edition.

Iterable

accepted challenger

Named in eleven categories this edition.

First-choice share9%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate37%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#7A position in a field of 18; printed, not drawn.
Labels4314A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Braze reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Customer.io was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Customer.io vs Braze · Customer.io vs Iterable · CleverTap vs Braze

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the mobile apps page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BrazeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsIterable
Direct214 against Braze
Paraphrase328 against Braze
Comparative10
Budget-constrained001 against Braze
Scale-constrained001 against Braze
Negative002 against Braze · 1 against Iterable
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Braze and Iterable were named in the same answer 165 times, of the 533 answers naming Braze and the 172 naming Iterable. In those answers Iterable took the first choice two times and Braze forty-six.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Braze and Iterable stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Braze Iterable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Braze on the left and Iterable on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Braze and Iterable stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
GLM 4.7 FlashXBraze, CleverTap, Iterable alternatives: Affise, AppsFlyer, Branch, MoEngage

Braze first, Iterable not the choice

1 of 14 modelsIterable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Braze, CleverTap alternatives: Customer.io, Intercom

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniCustomer.io alternatives: Airship, Braze, OneSignal
Mistral SmallCleverTap, Customer.io alternatives: Amplitude, AppsFlyer, Iterable, OneSignal, Pendo
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice alternatives: Acoustic, AppsFlyer, Braze, CleverTap, Customer.io
MiniMax M2.5Customer.io alternatives: Braze, OneSignal
GPT-6 LunaCustomer.io alternatives: AppsFlyer, Branch, Braze, OneSignal

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCustomer.io alternatives: Branch, OneSignal
Perplexity SonarAffise MMP alternatives: ActiveCampaign, AppsFlyer, MoEngage
Grok 4.1 FastAdjust alternatives: Branch
DeepSeek V4 FlashCustomer.io alternatives: MoEngage, OneSignal
Qwen 3.7 FlashAdobe Marketo Engage alternatives: ActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hub, OneSignal
Kimi K2Customer.io, HubSpot Marketing Hub alternatives: Intercom, OneSignal
Muse Glimmer 30BCleverTap, Customer.io alternatives: Dreamdata, MoEngage

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Braze0%#16 of 16
Iterable0%#– of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Braze leads by three points.
Braze9%#3 of 18
Iterable5%#7 of 18
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Braze leads by forty-six points.
Braze50%#1 of 12
Iterable4%#4 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Braze

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“For Full-Funnel Orchestration: Braze or Iterable (enterprise-grade journeys, strong B2B use cases)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Iterable

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Braze or Iterable (enterprise-grade journeys, strong B2B use cases)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“My Top Recommendation: Iterable or MoEngage” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Recommendation: Iterable” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.