Influencer platforms · September 2026 Edition
Modash vs Influencity
Two of twelve models named Modash first on the direct prompt; one named Influencity. Modash was named by twelve of the twelve models and Influencity by nine and Modash carries 36 labels and Influencity 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels3614A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Modash reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Favikon was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. Favikon vs Modash · Favikon vs Influencity · Afluencer vs Modash
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the influencer platforms page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ModashFirst choices, of twelve modelsInfluencity
Direct211 against Modash
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained002 against Modash
Scale-constrained00
Negative50
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Modash and Influencity stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Modash Influencity first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Modash on the left and Influencity on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Modash and Influencity stood in it.
Modash first, Influencity an alternative
2 of 12 modelsInfluencity was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Perplexity SonarFavikon, Modash alternatives: CreatorIQ, Influencity, Traackr
Llama 4 MaverickModash alternatives: Favikon, Skrapp
Influencity first, Modash not the choice
1 of 12 modelsModash was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.MiniMax M2.5Influencity alternatives: Limelight
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Favikon alternatives: Kolsquare, Modash, Skrapp, Traackr
Grok 4.1 FastFavikon alternatives: Influencity, Modash, Upfluence
Mistral SmallFavikon alternatives: Influencity
DeepSeek V4 FlashFavikon alternatives: GoByline, Kolsquare, Modash, Onalytica, Traackr
Qwen 3.7 FlashFavikon alternatives: GRIN, Modash
Kimi K2impact.com alternatives: Aspire, Modash, Traackr
Neither was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniCreatorIQ alternatives: Aspire, Upfluence, impact.com
Gemini 3.5 FlashFavikon alternatives: Limelight, Onalytica, SparkToro
GLM 4.7 FlashXFavikon, LinkedIn Creator Marketplace alternatives: Meltwater, Traackr
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Modash leads by sixteen points.
Modash16%#2 of 14Influencity0%#12 of 14Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Modash0%#– of 8Influencity0%#– of 8What the models said about Modash
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Platforms to AVOID on a Limited Budget - Modash \u2014 $299\u2013$599/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Modash for pure B2B unless you're extending existing B2C campaigns” Mistral Small · direct prompt · hard negative
“$199/mo (annual; trial) | Deep discovery | 350M+ DB, audience analytics; not free long-term.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“alternatives to these platforms, such as Modash, which is an influencer search software that has a database of creators on Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · first choice
“Look for platforms that offer month-to-month pricing or pay-as-you-go models (like Modash, Collabstr, or Promoty).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“if your use case is broader and channel-agnostic, Modash is the safer all-around choice” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Influencity
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Influencity is the most practical mid-market choice for its price transparency and balanced feature set.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Workflow & reporting ... affordable vs. enterprise. | Quote-based; secondary LinkedIn.” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · alternative
“best if you want published pricing and a broader mid-market full-funnel toolset” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
Favikon vs ModashFavikon vs InfluencityAfluencer vs ModashAfluencer vs InfluencityGRIN vs ModashGRIN vs InfluencityCreatorIQ vs ModashCreatorIQ vs InfluencityAspire vs ModashAspire vs InfluencityModash vs TraackrInfluencity vs TraackrAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full influencer standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.