GTM AI Index
Index GTM data and infrastructure Consent › Termly vs Complianz
Consent and privacy management · September 2026 Edition

Termly vs Complianz

Zero of twelve models named Termly first on the direct prompt; zero named Complianz. Termly was named by eleven of the twelve models and Complianz by ten and Termly carries 18 labels and Complianz 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Termly

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Complianz

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share6%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate22%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels1813A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Termly reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Osano was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Enzuzo vs Termly · Enzuzo vs Complianz · Osano vs Termly

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the consent and privacy management page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TermlyFirst choices, of twelve modelsComplianz
Direct001 against Termly
Paraphrase002 against Termly
Comparative00
Budget-constrained321 against Termly
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Termly and Complianz were named in the same answer twenty-six times, of the 60 answers naming Termly and the 36 naming Complianz. In those answers Complianz took the first choice two times and Termly five.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Termly and Complianz stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Termly Complianz first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Termly on the left and Complianz on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Termly and Complianz stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Mistral SmallEnzuzo alternatives: Ketch, Osano, Termly, Usercentrics

Neither was named

11 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniOsano alternatives: TrustArc
Gemini 3.5 FlashOsano alternatives: Ketch, Usercentrics
Perplexity SonarEnzuzo alternatives: Cookiebot, OneTrust, Osano, Usercentrics
Grok 4.1 FastEnzuzo alternatives: CookieYes, Osano, Secure Privacy, Usercentrics
DeepSeek V4 FlashOsano alternatives: Enzuzo
Llama 4 MaverickOsano alternatives: Enzuzo
Qwen 3.7 FlashOsano alternatives: Secure Privacy, Usercentrics
Kimi K2Enzuzo, Osano alternatives: CookieYes, Cookiebot, Usercentrics CMP, iubenda
GLM 4.7 FlashXEnzuzo, Usercentrics alternatives: CookieYes, Osano
MiniMax M2.5Cookiebot, Enzuzo alternatives: OneTrust, TrustArc

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Termly leads by eight points.
Termly12%#2 of 12
Complianz4%#6 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Termly leads by two points.
Termly6%#6 of 15
Complianz4%#8 of 15
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Termly0%#– of 8
Complianz0%#– of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Termly

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“What to Avoid at Your Size - Termly / CookieYes — Fine for small businesses, but per-domain pricing and feature ceilings” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“basic plugins (like Termly or CookieYes) lack the multi-jurisdiction geo-targeting, automated workflows, and CRM integrations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“This makes Termly risky for a business that cannot afford downtime in compliance.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Complianz for WordPress or Termly for a general small business site” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Termly ⭐ Best Overall Free Choice” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Termly ⭐ Best Overall Value” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Complianz

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“If I had to pick one budget-friendly default, I'd say Complianz for WordPress” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“CookieScript or Complianz free plans are typically the best starting points.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“If you're on WordPress and want the lowest recurring cost, consider Complianz (~$59/year).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.