AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Customer › Contact center QA › CloudTalk vs Level AI
Contact center quality assurance · October 2026 Edition

CloudTalk vs Level AI

Zero of fourteen models named CloudTalk first on the direct prompt; one named Level AI. CloudTalk was named by nine of the fourteen models and Level AI by nine and CloudTalk carries 15 labels and Level AI 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.

CloudTalk

accepted challenger

Named in thirteen categories this edition.

Level AI

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1512A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, CloudTalk reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.EvaluAgent was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. EvaluAgent vs CloudTalk · EvaluAgent vs Level AI · Scorebuddy vs CloudTalk

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the contact center quality assurance page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CloudTalkFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLevel AI
Direct01
Paraphrase00
Comparative01
Budget-constrained20
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where CloudTalk and Level AI stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
CloudTalk Level AI first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, CloudTalk on the left and Level AI on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where CloudTalk and Level AI stood in it.

Level AI first, CloudTalk not the choice

1 of 14 modelsCloudTalk was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniLevel AI alternatives: Calabrio ONE, Scorebuddy, Zendesk QA

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Scorebuddy alternatives: Convin, EvaluAgent, Gong, Level AI
Gemini 3.5 FlashZendesk QA alternatives: EvaluAgent, Level AI, MaestroQA
Perplexity SonarScorebuddy alternatives: AmplifAI, Balto, EvaluAgent, Level AI

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Grok 4.1 FastEvaluAgent, Scorebuddy alternatives: Balto, Talkdesk QM, Zendesk QA
Mistral SmallEvaluAgent, Scorebuddy alternatives: Talkdesk
DeepSeek V4 FlashEvaluAgent alternatives: AmplifAI, Observe.AI, Scorebuddy, Talkdesk, Zendesk QA
Llama 4 MaverickEvaluAgent alternatives: GetApp, Scorebuddy
Qwen 3.7 FlashCallMiner Eureka alternatives: Five9 Agent Connect, MaestroQA, NICE CXone Quality Management, Playvox
Kimi K2EvaluAgent alternatives: Playvox, ScorebuddyCX, Zendesk QA
GLM 4.7 FlashXAmplifAI, Balto alternatives: EvaluAgent, Playvox QM, Scorebuddy
MiniMax M2.5Scorebuddy alternatives: EvaluAgent, Voxjar, Zendesk QA
GPT-6 LunaEvaluAgent alternatives: CallMiner Eureka, NICE CXone Quality Management
Muse Glimmer 30BObserve.AI, Zendesk QA alternatives: EvaluAgent, Playvox, Scorebuddy

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
CloudTalk leads by fifteen points.
CloudTalk15%#2 of 12
Level AI0%#– of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
CloudTalk leads by two points.
CloudTalk4%#5 of 13
Level AI2%#8 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
CloudTalk is not named for this buyer.
Level AI4%#8 of 14
CloudTalk—not named
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about CloudTalk

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Level AI

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“my default recommendation is Level AI if you want the most balanced mix of AI-powered QA, omnichannel coverage, and mid-market fit” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“often ranked #1 for comprehensive QA” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Level AI is recommended for mid-market contact centers consolidating conversation intelligence and QA on one platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.