GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › VerifiedEmail · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

VerifiedEmail

6Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. VerifiedEmail was named 2 times in Email verification, where ZeroBounce led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business44 of 48

under the label threshold

Mid-market20 of 53

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In email verification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named VerifiedEmail for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Email verification	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	20 of 53	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by ZeroBounce at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for VerifiedEmail yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated VerifiedEmail across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“uses a pay-as-you-go model starting at just $7 for 1,000 emails, making it accessible for businesses of all sizes” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email verification · budget prompt · alternative

“If you're on an extremely tight budget: Try VerifiedEmail” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Email verification · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as VerifiedEmail, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and VerifiedEmail was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

EmailListVerify4 of 61Not in the top three

Clearout4 of 60Not in the top three

MyEmailVerifier3 of 62Not in the top three

Bouncer3 of 61Not in the top three

NeverBounce3 of 60Not in the top three

ZeroBounce3 of 60Not in the top three

Proofy.io2 of 60Not in the top three

MillionVerifier1 of 61Not in the top three

QuickEmailVerification1 of 61Not in the top three

Reoon1 of 61Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named VerifiedEmail. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 6 answers that named VerifiedEmail and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

accuwebhosting.com2

debounce.com2

emailvendorselection.com2

hunter.io2

mailtrap.io2

myemailverifier.com2

usebouncer.com2

verified.emailYour site2

appsumo.com1

bouncebuster.io1

Sixteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming VerifiedEmail came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

accuwebhosting.com/blog/top-10-bulk-email-list-verification-validation-services-compared2

debounce.com/blog/email-verification-tools2

emailvendorselection.com/email-verification-tools2

mailtrap.io/blog/email-verification-tools2

verified.email/blog/email-verification/affordable-bulk-email-verification-tools2

appsumo.com/products/emailverifyio/reviews1

bouncebuster.io/why-every-small-business-needs-an-email-verification-service-in-2025-21

bouncecheck.email/blog/best-bulk-email-verifier1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

VerifiedEmail.

Website: verified.email
Founded: 2024

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when VerifiedEmail's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as VerifiedEmail, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at verified.email is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.