AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Validity Engage · October 2026 Edition
Validity · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Validity Engage

9Judge labels
5First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Validity Engage was named 1 time in Email deliverability, where GlockApps led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In email deliverability · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Validity Engage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Email deliverability and testing toolsMarketing2%23 of 1100%1under 10 labels · led by GlockApps at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Validity Engage yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Validity Engage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels2
Paraphrase4 labels3
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd generally recommend Validity Engage if your main priority is inbox placement + deliverability monitoring” GPT-5.4 mini · Email deliverability · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Validity Engage, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Validity Engage was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Litmus4 of 91Not among the top eight
GlockApps4 of 90Not among the top eight
Inbox Monster4 of 90Not among the top eight
Validity Everest2 of 91Not among the top eight
Mailgun Optimize2 of 90Not among the top eight
ZeroBounce2 of 90Not among the top eight
Cleanlist1 of 91Not among the top eight
DemandTools1 of 91Not among the top eight
Clearout1 of 90Not among the top eight
Data81 of 90Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Validity Engage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Validity Engage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

validity.comYour site5
g2.com3
inboxmonster.com3
litmus.com3
emailtooltester.com2
emailvendorselection.com2
help.litmus.com2
help.mailgun.com2
inboxarmy.com2
mailflowauthority.com2

Twenty-one of the twenty-six domain citations in answers naming Validity Engage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

validity.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Validity Engage takes 2% of first choices and GlockApps takes 34%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “email deliverability tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best email deliverability tool”
–
not in the top ten
Its company's site
validity.com shared with Validity's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 24,467 a month
Searches its site ranks for
3,010 · 182 in the top three
Sites linking to it
5,887
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 20 clicks and $264 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 98 text, 21 image, 1 video · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2025, as Validity, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 119 in the year, 1 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 23 of 110 in email deliverability
Segment leader
34%
GlockApps
First choices
5 across its categories
Named in
9 answers
Its own site cited
in 9 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Validity Engage

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Validity is the company behind Validity Engage.
ShowHide

On record

Company records
Also from Validity
Validity Everest

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI-powered email creation and optimization at your fingertips.
For
enterprise teams
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Validity Engage's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: validity.com/get-engage, validity.com/get-engage/thank-you, validity.com/resources/email-engagement, outfitters.validity.com/collections/validity, certification.validity.com/groups/engage-nhan. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Validity Engage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Validity Engage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Validity Engage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Validity Engage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Validity Engage, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at validity.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.