Every category where a model named Inbox Monster for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Email deliverability and testing tools	Marketing	0%	64 of 110	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by GlockApps at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Inbox Monster yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Inbox Monster across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative4 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“consider Everest or Inbox Monster for a more comprehensive, ongoing program” GPT-6 Luna · Email deliverability · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Inbox Monster, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Inbox Monster was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GlockApps7 of 111Not among the top eight

Validity Everest6 of 114Not among the top eight

Litmus6 of 111Not among the top eight

Email on Acid5 of 110Not among the top eight

Validity Engage4 of 112Not among the top eight

Google Postmaster Tools2 of 110Not among the top eight

Mailgun Optimize2 of 110Not among the top eight

Everest1 of 111Not among the top eight

Folderly1 of 110Not among the top eight

MailReach1 of 110Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Inbox Monster. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Inbox Monster and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

inboxmonster.comYour site5

validity.com5

glockapps.com4

inboxarmy.com4

mailflowauthority.com4

guideflow.com3

litmus.com3

salesdorado.com3

suped.com3

besthunt.ai2

Thirty-one of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming Inbox Monster came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

inboxarmy.com/blog/12-best-email-deliverability-tools4

glockapps.com/3

guideflow.com/blog/email-testing-software3

salesdorado.com/en/inbound-marketing/email-testing-tools3

besthunt.ai/best-email-testing-tools2

emailcloud.com/reviews/validity-everest-review2

emailexpert.com/email-marketing-tools-alternatives-to-litmus-after-validity-acquisition2

emailwarmup.com/blog/email-deliverability-tools/validity-everest-review2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

inboxmonster.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Inbox Monster takes 0% of first choices and GlockApps takes 34%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “email deliverability tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best email deliverability tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 720 a month (“inbox monster”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 4 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 730 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 201 · 16 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 646
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

17 ads · 17 text · 7 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2023, as Project Bordeaux, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 8 in the year, 9 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 64 of 110 in email deliverability

Segment leader

34%

GlockApps

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 11 answers
Its own site cited: in 11 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on inboxmonster.com

166

subdomains included

Content

121

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	112	20	2026-10-01	CRM
Conference or event	3	0	2026-04-30
Glossary or explainer	3	0	2026-06-16
Case study	1	undated
Webinar or virtual event	1	0	2026-06-10
Template or tool	1	0	2026-06-24

Most recent

2026-10-01Email design trends 2026 holiday season blog
2026-09-23Gmail reputation data is removed postmaster tools blog
2026-09-22A review of apples ai preview text blog
2026-09-22Apple brings ai to its mail app what does it mean for you blog
2026-09-22Black friday transactional trigger emails blog
2026-09-22Dark mode email qa guide blog

Events in person

Last twelve months

September 28, 2026 to September 30, 2026Braze ForgeLas Vegas, US · attended
August 10, 2026 to August 12, 2026eTailBoston, US · attended
June 16, 2026 to June 17, 2026Movable Ink’s Think SummitNew York City, US · attended
June 3, 2026 to June 4, 2026Salesforce ConnectionsChicago, US · took part
May 26, 2026 to May 28, 2026Inbox ExpoAtlanta, US · attended
reported April 2026Email Insider Summit 2026Ocean Reef Club, Key Largo · attended
reported April 2026Adobe SummitLas Vegas · attended
reported April 2026Activate SummitLos Angeles · spoke
reported April 2026Inbox ExpoAtlanta · attended
reported April 2026Think SummitNYC · attended
reported April 2026eTailBoston · attended
reported April 2026Salesforce ConnectionsChicago · took part
April 21, 2026 to April 23, 2026Iterable’s Activate SummitLos Angeles, US · spoke
April 20, 2026 to April 22, 2026Adobe SummitLas Vegas, US · sponsored
April 20, 2026 to April 22, 2026Unspam by Really Good EmailsLong Beach, US · attended
April 12, 2026 to April 15, 2026Email Insider SummitKey Largo, US · attended

As the event pages on inboxmonster.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page inboxmonster.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Inbox Monster

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Inbox Monster's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Inbox Monster, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Inbox Monster by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Inbox Monster is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Inbox Monster, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.