Every category where a model named Folderly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Email deliverability and testing tools	Marketing	3%	6 of 110	5%	20	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Folderly yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Folderly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	1	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	2	0	0	3
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct17 labels3

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative14 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Folderly and GlockApps are top choices due to their comprehensive features and strong reputations” Mistral Small · Email deliverability · direct prompt · first choice

“Folderly or Mailtrap would be the top choices.” MiniMax M2.5 · Email deliverability · direct prompt · first choice

“Built specifically for B2B sales teams and lead-generation agencies running cold-email campaigns at scale” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email deliverability · direct prompt · alternative

“Folderly | For the upper end of mid-sized, offering white-glove concierge support.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Email deliverability · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Overpriced for most mid-market teams — many reviewers suggest MailReach as a better-value alternative.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Email deliverability · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Folderly, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Folderly was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GlockApps40 of 5214Compare →

Validity Everest30 of 5213Compare →

MailReach27 of 524Compare →

MXToolbox25 of 523Compare →

Litmus19 of 520Not among the top eight

Google Postmaster Tools18 of 524Compare →

ZeroBounce16 of 520Not among the top eight

Microsoft SNDS13 of 520Compare →

Mail-Tester12 of 520Compare →

Mailtrap12 of 520Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Folderly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 52 of the 52 answers that named Folderly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

amplemarket.com31

mailercheck.com24

myemailverifier.com23

folderly.comYour site22

instantly.ai22

mailreach.co20

mailtrap.io20

saleshandy.com19

allegrow.co18

g2.com18

195 of the 217 domain citations in answers naming Folderly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

amplemarket.com/blog/best-email-deliverability-tools31

mailercheck.com/articles/best-email-deliverability-tools24

myemailverifier.com/blog/email-deliverability-tools23

allegrow.co/knowledge-base/email-deliverability-tools18

saleshandy.com/blog/email-deliverability-tools18

therankmasters.com/insights/email-marketing/best-email-deliverability-tools18

folderly.com/blog/email-deliverability-tools17

omnisend.com/blog/email-deliverability-tools17

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

folderly.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Folderly takes 3% of first choices and GlockApps takes 34%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “email deliverability tool”

Position for “best email deliverability tool”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 880 a month (“folderly”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 11 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 2,464 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,636 · 57 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,823
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 110 in email deliverability

Segment leader

34%

GlockApps

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 52 answers
Its own site cited: in 52 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on folderly.com

626

subdomains included

Content

324

counted in the table below

Documentation

113

Product · Integration

5 · 16

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	220	30	2026-09-28	Email verification, Sales engagement
Comparison	35	3	2026-09-28
Case study	32	undated		CRM
Template or tool	18	2	2026-07-20
Glossary or explainer	16	0	2026-06-18
Report or ebook	3	undated

Most recent

2026-09-28Warmy alternatives comparison
2026-09-28Microsoft snds blog
2026-09-28Outlook spam filter blog
2026-09-28Glockapps alternatives comparison
2026-09-28Google postmaster tools blog
2026-09-17How to know if your outbound engine is built to scale blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page folderly.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Folderly

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Folderly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Folderly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Folderly by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Folderly is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Folderly, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.