Folderly vs Microsoft SNDS
Two of fourteen models named Folderly first on the direct prompt; zero named Microsoft SNDS. Folderly was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Microsoft SNDS by ten and Folderly carries 20 labels and Microsoft SNDS 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Microsoft SNDS
accepted challengerBy Microsoft, Vancouver, Canada, founded 1975. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the email deliverability and testing tools page.
By framing
FolderlyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMicrosoft SNDSAcross every category in the October 2026 Edition, Folderly and Microsoft SNDS were named in the same answer thirteen times, of the 52 answers naming Folderly and the 41 naming Microsoft SNDS. In those answers Microsoft SNDS took the first choice zero times and Folderly zero.
Every model, every framing
| Model | DirectMS | ParaphraseMS | ComparativeMS | Budget-constrainedMS | Scale-constrainedMS | NegativeMS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | MS | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | MS | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | MS | ||||
| Mistral Small | | MS | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | MS | | MS | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | MS | |||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | MS | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | MS |
FolderlyMS Microsoft SNDS first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Folderly on the left and Microsoft SNDS on the right.The direct prompt
Folderly first, Microsoft SNDS not the choice
2 of 14 modelsMicrosoft SNDS was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Folderly2%#13 of 15Folderly3%#6 of 12Folderly2%#6 of 14What the models said about Folderly
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Overpriced for most mid-market teams — many reviewers suggest MailReach as a better-value alternative.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Folderly and GlockApps are top choices due to their comprehensive features and strong reputations” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Folderly or Mailtrap would be the top choices.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Built specifically for B2B sales teams and lead-generation agencies running cold-email campaigns at scale” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
What the models said about Microsoft SNDS
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Set up Google Postmaster Tools (free) and Microsoft SNDS (free). These are the only tools that provide direct, unvarnished reputation data” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Best free option: Stack Google Postmaster Tools, Microsoft SNDS, Yahoo Sender Hub, MXToolbox, Mail Tester, AboutMyEmail, and Sender Hub.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“free monitoring stack with Google Postmaster Tools, Microsoft SNDS, MXToolbox, and Yahoo Sender Hub” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.