Every category where a model named Sales Layer PIM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Product information management	Revenue operations	4%	4 of 68	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Plytix at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sales Layer PIM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sales Layer PIM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Sales Layer PIM: Best for SMBs to simplify product management with strong import/export capabilities and support for various file types. ($499/mo)” Llama 4 Maverick · PIM · budget prompt · first choice

“Sales Layer PIM is the top recommendation due to its strong B2B focus, AI capabilities, and scalability.” Mistral Small · PIM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Starting around $499/month - Strong import/export capabilities” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PIM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sales Layer PIM, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sales Layer PIM was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Plytix3 of 63Not among the top eight

Akeneo PIM2 of 60Not among the top eight

Catsy2 of 60Not among the top eight

Apollon1 of 60Not among the top eight

Ergonode1 of 60Not among the top eight

KatanaPIM1 of 60Not among the top eight

Kontainer1 of 60Not among the top eight

OneTimePIM1 of 60Not among the top eight

Pimberly SaaS PIM & DAM1 of 60Not among the top eight

Pimly1 of 60Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sales Layer PIM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Sales Layer PIM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com4

atropim.com3

g2.com3

netguru.com3

omr.com3

plytix.com3

inriver.com2

sourceforge.net2

blog.marketingblatt.com1

checkthat.ai1

No domain is on file for Sales Layer PIM, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-pim-software4

atropim.com/en/blog/pim-software-comparison3

netguru.com/blog/pim-for-b2b3

g2.com/categories/product-information-management-pim2

inriver.com/resources/best-pim-software2

omr.com/en/reviews/contenthub/best-pim-systems2

plytix.com/pim2

atropim.com/en/blog/pim-software-companies1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Sales Layer PIM stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 30 a month (“sales layer pim”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 4 of 68 in PIM

Segment leader

34%

Plytix

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 6 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Sales Layer PIM

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sales Layer PIM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sales Layer PIM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sales Layer PIM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Sales Layer PIM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sales Layer PIM, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.