GTM AI Index

Index › Products › PriceBeam · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

PriceBeam

9Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PriceBeam was named 2 times in Pricing optimization, where Pricefx led with 53%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business29 of 98

under the label threshold

Mid-market22 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In pricing optimization · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PriceBeam for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Pricing optimization	Revenue operations	0%	22 of 76	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Pricefx at 53%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PriceBeam yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PriceBeam across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Businesses needing global pricing research and value‑based insights.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Pricing optimization · comparative prompt · alternative

“PriceBeam offers exceptional value at a fraction of the cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pricing optimization · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PriceBeam, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PriceBeam was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Prisync8 of 95Not among the top eight

Price2Spy6 of 90Not among the top eight

Quicklizard4 of 91Not among the top eight

PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management4 of 90Not among the top eight

Pricefx3 of 91Not among the top eight

PriceLabs3 of 90Not among the top eight

Vendavo3 of 90Not among the top eight

Zilliant3 of 90Not among the top eight

7Learnings2 of 90Not among the top eight

BlackCurve2 of 90Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PriceBeam. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named PriceBeam and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gitnux.org7

zipdo.co7

croclub.com6

worldmetrics.org6

guideflow.com5

softwareadvice.com5

articsledge.com4

capterra.com4

dupple.com4

omniaretail.com4

Fifty-two of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming PriceBeam came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

croclub.com/tools/best-pricing-software6

softwareadvice.com/pricing-optimization5

dupple.com/learn/best-ai-price-optimization-tools4

gitnux.org/best/pricing-optimization-software4

worldmetrics.org/best/price-optimisation-software4

articsledge.com/post/best-dynamic-pricing-software-for-small-business-sales-teams3

g2.com/categories/pricing/small-business3

guideflow.com/blog/best-pricing-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow PriceBeam

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PriceBeam's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PriceBeam, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PriceBeam by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where PriceBeam is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name PriceBeam, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.