GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Kendo.ai · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Kendo.ai

2Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

2 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Kendo.ai was named 2 times in Sales gamification, where Spinify led with 31%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market11 of 64

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In sales gamification · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Kendo.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Sales gamification	Sales	2%	11 of 64	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Spinify at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kendo.ai yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kendo.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Evaluate Ambition and Kendo.ai for their robust leaderboard and coaching features.” Mistral Small · Sales gamification · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“with Kendo.ai as a strong lightweight alternative depending on your rollout priorities” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales gamification · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kendo.ai, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kendo.ai was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Ambition2 of 20Not among the top eight

SalesScreen1 of 21Not among the top eight

SetSail1 of 20Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kendo.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Kendo.ai and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

kendo.aiYour site2

leaderboarded.com2

spotio.com2

wifitalents.com2

zipdo.co2

forecastio.ai1

g2.com1

guideflow.com1

itechguides.com1

openloyalty.io1

Thirteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Kendo.ai came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

kendo.ai/blogs/best-sales-gamification-software-tools2

leaderboarded.com/blog/posts/best-online-leaderboard-maker-tools2

leaderboarded.com/sales-gamification-software2

spotio.com/blog/sales-leaderboards2

wifitalents.com/best/sales-leaderboard-software2

zipdo.co/best/sales-leaderboard-software2

forecastio.ai/blog/best-sales-performance-management-software1

g2.com/categories/sales-gamification1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on kendo.ai

165

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

11 · 0

Kind	Pages	Latest
Blog	49	2026-04-30
Comparison	29	2026-04-30
Case study	4	2026-04-30

Most recent

2026-04-30United insurance case study
2026-04-30Kendo vs pitchmonster comparison
2026-04-30Kendo vs hyperbound comparison
2026-04-30Kendo vs mindtickle comparison
2026-04-30Kendo vs fullyramped comparison
2026-04-30Kendo vs gong comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page kendo.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Kendo.ai

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kendo.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kendo.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kendo.ai by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Kendo.ai is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Kendo.ai, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.