Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 34 → 69 of 92
1 category · Named, not rankedIndexly
3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Indexly was named 2 times in AI visibility, where Otterly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business72 of 94
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market38 of 90
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In ai visibility · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Indexly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools | Marketing | 0% | 38 of 90 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Indexly held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · AI visibility · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 37 of 85, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 38 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Indexly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Indexly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Indexly is a strong second choice.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI visibility · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Indexly, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Indexly was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Indexly, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Indexly was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Indexly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Indexly and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
indexly.aiYour site3
integrate.io2
aeoengine.ai1
ahrefs.com1
aipeekaboo.com1
airanklab.com1
airops.com1
allaboutai.com1
amicited.com1
arfadia.com1
Ten of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Indexly came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
indexly.ai ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Indexly takes 0% of first choices and Otterly takes 20%.ShowHide
Search and answers
indexly.ai ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Indexly takes 0% of first choices and Otterly takes 20%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai visibility and answer engine tracking tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ai visibility and answer engine tracking tool”
1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 38 of 90 in AI visibility
Segment leader
20%
Otterly
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 3 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 3 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on indexly.ai
495
subdomains included
Content
252
counted in the table below
Documentation
24
Product · Integration
83 · 3
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 162 | 0 | 2026-06-15 | SEO | |
| Blog | 42 | 5 | 2026-09-22 | SEO | |
| News or press | 19 | 8 | 2026-09-29 | SEO | |
| Comparison | 16 | undated | |||
| Case study | 12 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29How to turn your x posts into ai citations news or press
- 2026-09-22Reddit chatgpt citations aug 2026 blog
- 2026-09-22Stop copying content manually news or press
- 2026-09-20Chatgpt ads growth playbook sep 2026 blog
- 2026-09-16Track brand on microsoft copilot news or press
- 2026-09-15How microsoft copilot citations work sep 2026 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page indexly.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Indexly
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Indexly is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Indexly is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Search Visibility Platform
- For
- Any brand that depends on being discovered — SaaS companies, agencies, D2C and eCommerce brands, publishers, and enterprises.
- Price stated
- 0 indexly.ai
- Starting price
- 0 indexly.ai
- Free plan or trial
- 0 indexly.ai
- Integrations claimed
- 6 indexly.ai
- Certifications
- SOC 2ISO 27001
- Customers named
- KolsetuPlugThisCircleChessAcme.ioNorthwindOleraEssayCheckerRecurpay
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Indexly's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: indexly.ai, indexly.ai/pricing, trust.indexly.ai, indexly.ai/features/team, indexly.ai/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Indexly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Indexly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Indexly by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Indexly is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Indexly, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.