AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Sales › Revenue intel › Pipedrive vs BoostUp
Revenue intelligence and forecasting · October 2026 Edition

Pipedrive vs BoostUp

Zero of fourteen models named Pipedrive first on the direct prompt; one named BoostUp. Pipedrive was named by twelve of the fourteen models and BoostUp by ten and Pipedrive carries 14 labels and BoostUp 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Pipedrive

accepted challenger

New York City, founded 2010. Named in fourteen categories this edition.

BoostUp

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels1410A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Pipedrive reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Clari Copilot was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. Clari Copilot vs Pipedrive · Clari Copilot vs BoostUp · HubSpot Sales Hub vs Pipedrive

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the revenue intelligence and forecasting page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PipedriveFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBoostUp
Direct01
Paraphrase10
Comparative00
Budget-constrained10
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Pipedrive and BoostUp stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Pipedrive BoostUp first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Pipedrive on the left and BoostUp on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Pipedrive and BoostUp stood in it.

BoostUp first, Pipedrive not the choice

1 of 14 modelsPipedrive was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashBoostUp alternatives: Clari Copilot

Neither was named

13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Terret alternatives: Aviso, Avoma, HubSpot Sales Hub
GPT-5.4 miniClari Copilot alternatives: Aviso, Gong
Gemini 3.5 FlashGong alternatives: Ebsta, HubSpot Sales Hub, Terret
Perplexity SonarClari Copilot alternatives: Avoma, Revenue.io, Salesforce Revenue Intelligence
Grok 4.1 FastRevenue Grid alternatives: Clari Copilot, HubSpot Sales Hub
Mistral SmallClari Copilot alternatives: Demandbase, Gong, HubSpot Sales Hub
DeepSeek V4 FlashTerret alternatives: Avoma, Clari Copilot, Gong, Salesforce Revenue Intelligence
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2Avoma alternatives: Clari Copilot, Gong
GLM 4.7 FlashXClari Copilot alternatives: Gong, HubSpot Sales Hub, ZoomInfo GTM Workspace
MiniMax M2.5Clari Copilot, Gong alternatives: HubSpot Sales Hub, Revenue Grid
GPT-6 LunaGong alternatives: HubSpot Sales Hub, Salesforce Revenue Intelligence, Salesloft with Clari Forecast
Muse Glimmer 30BRevenue Grid alternatives: Clari Copilot, HubSpot Sales Hub, Salesforce Revenue Intelligence

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
BoostUp is not named for this buyer.
Pipedrive26%#2 of 13
BoostUp—not named
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Pipedrive leads by two points.
Pipedrive4%#5 of 14
BoostUp2%#7 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Pipedrive is not named for this buyer.
Pipedrive—not named
BoostUp0%#– of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Pipedrive

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Pipedrive is the most balanced choice—offering built‑in forecasting, visual pipeline management, and cost‑effective pricing” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about BoostUp

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“BoostUp is currently the strongest specialist choice for the mid-market” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want AI-powered forecasting: BoostUp (now Terret) provides AI-powered forecasting with strong pipeline analytics and risk detection” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Excellent, highly-rated mid-market alternatives to Clari” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.